Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Iowa

Courtyard Estates Cedar Pointe

Pleasant Hill, IA · ~27 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Courtyard Estates Cedar Pointe runs at 223% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Courtyard Estates Cedar Pointe: 8.5 TCR = 223% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Courtyard Estates Cedar Pointe safety composite

Courtyard Estates Cedar Pointe scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Courtyard Estates Cedar Pointe: 4.7 → 6.0 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 23.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.7× in 2021

Courtyard Estates Cedar Pointe's TCR rose 1.3 from 4.7 in 2017 to 6.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 23.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Pleasant Hill, IA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.5 · 223% of ind

  • DART 6.0 DART
  • RANK #61/121
  • PHOTO Penney Retirement Co…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Penney Retirement Community, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Iowa employers → · Look up another →

Courtyard Estates Cedar Pointe in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Courtyard Estates Cedar Pointe averages 8.5 TCR (223% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Courtyard Estates Cedar Pointe TCR series: 2017=4.7 · 2019=23.2 · 2020=0 · 2021=6 · BLS 3.8

Where Courtyard Estates Cedar Pointe falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Iowa alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #61 safest of 121 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Iowa.

Courtyard Estates Cedar Pointe (27 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Courtyard Estates Cedar Pointe
Courtyard Estates Cedar Pointe (27 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Courtyard Estates Cedar Pointe has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 6.0 6.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 23.2 0.0 5 0 0
2017 4.7 4.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · IA · Pleasant Hill

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,192 rated employers in Iowa with headcount on file · 14 employers in Pleasant Hill, IA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Penney Retirement Community, Inc. 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Worthington Bickford 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wedgewood Estates of Mansfield 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meadow Gardens of Menlo Park 8.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2520-Storm Lake, IA (Monsanto Co.) 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wastewater Treatment Plant 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Quality Construction Services, Inc. 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Weitz Company - Mission Critical - Microsoft DSM 14 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pleasant Hill - Main Store 187 FTE
CITY-NEAR 022M - DES MOINES IA RNTL 137 FTE
CITY-NEAR FAREWAY STORES, INC. 138 PLEASANT HILL 125 FTE
CITY-NEAR US Erectors Inc. 79 FTE
NAT-TCR Good Samaritan Society - Idaho Falls Village 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR The Detering Company of Houston LP 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Wedgewood Estates of Mansfield 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Renovex / Provanta Inc 8.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE SBS of Tennessee (Knoxville) 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Milestone Senior Living Stoughton 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Philadelphia Enjoy House 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Medina Campus 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.