Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Georgia

Phoenix at Lake Lanier

Gainesville, GA · ~69 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Phoenix at Lake Lanier runs at 299% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Phoenix at Lake Lanier: 11.4 TCR = 299% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Phoenix at Lake Lanier safety composite

Phoenix at Lake Lanier scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−26.8

2022→2024

Phoenix at Lake Lanier injury rate improved

Phoenix at Lake Lanier's TCR fell 26.8 from 30.5 in 2022 to 3.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 30.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=30.5 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=3.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Gainesville, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.4 · 299% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK #147/205
  • PHOTO Ecumen CountrySide
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ecumen CountrySide (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Phoenix at Lake Lanier in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Phoenix at Lake Lanier averages 11.4 TCR (299% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Phoenix at Lake Lanier TCR series: 2022=30.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Phoenix at Lake Lanier falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #147 safest of 205 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Georgia.

Phoenix at Lake Lanier (69 employees, TCR 11.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Phoenix at Lake Lanier
Phoenix at Lake Lanier (69 employees, TCR 11.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Phoenix at Lake Lanier has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.7 3.7 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 30.5 30.5 2 17 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · GA · Gainesville

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 306 employers in Gainesville, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ecumen CountrySide 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hacienda 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Springdale 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Riverdale 11.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE NW Metro Regional Business Center 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atlanta Glass and Mirror - Decatur 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE NCCOR - Woodstock - Corporate 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE M-Communication LLC 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Inc. 5,384 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kubota Manufacturing of America Corporation 1,863 FTE
CITY-NEAR Poultry Processing 1,546 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mar-Jac Poultry, Inc Processing Plant 1,190 FTE
NAT-TCR TN Truss Components Inc 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Kennedy Krieger Powder Mill Campus 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Lile International Companies Branch 204 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Crockett Enterprises, Inc. 11.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE TLG- St. Louis 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Integrated Power Services National Field Services 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Engineered Construction Services, Inc. 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nissan of Clearwater 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.