Airport operators (e.g., civil, international, national) · Arizona

Phoenix Mesa Gateway Airport Authority

Mesa, AZ · ~113 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Phoenix Mesa Gateway Airport Authority runs at 83% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Airport operators (e.g., civil, international, national) workplace, earning a grade C.

Phoenix Mesa Gateway Airport Authority: 3.8 TCR = 83% of Airport operators (e.g., civil, international, national) BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Phoenix Mesa Gateway Airport Authority safety composite

Phoenix Mesa Gateway Airport Authority scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Phoenix Mesa Gateway Airport Authority: 2.2 → 5.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 5.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.53× in 2024

Phoenix Mesa Gateway Airport Authority's TCR rose 2.8 from 2.2 in 2022 to 5.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488119 · Mesa, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.8 · 83% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #9/28
  • PHOTO 00001325 LRD - 325 L…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~113 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 00001325 LRD - 325 LAREDO INTL AIRPORT (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Phoenix Mesa Gateway Airport Authority in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Phoenix Mesa Gateway Airport Authority averages 3.8 TCR (83% of the Airport operators (e.g., civil, international, national) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Phoenix Mesa Gateway Airport Authority TCR series: 2022=2.2 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=5 · BLS 4.5

Where Phoenix Mesa Gateway Airport Authority falls in its industry

1,555 Airport operators (e.g., civil establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 28 Airport operators (e.g., civil employers in Arizona.

Phoenix Mesa Gateway Airport Authority (113 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Phoenix Mesa Gateway Airport Authority
Phoenix Mesa Gateway Airport Authority (113 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Phoenix Mesa Gateway Airport Authority has more employees than the Airport operators (e.g., civil, internat median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.0 2.0 4 1 0
2023 4.1 4.1 3 1 0
2022 2.2 1.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488119 · AZ · Mesa

1,555 Airport operators (e.g., civil, international, national) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 565 employers in Mesa, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 00001325 LRD - 325 LAREDO INTL AIRPORT 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR AIR GRDS MAINT 1150 N. 3850 W. 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4833-66058 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4765-PITPW9654 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Paradise Valley 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tohono Oddham Utility Authority 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mesa Greenfield Water Treatment Plant 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE National Powerline LLC - National Powerline 113 FTE
CITY-NEAR AZ001 4,193 FTE
CITY-NEAR AZAPW9668 AZA - RAMP PAX 3,181 FTE
CITY-NEAR 04-290370278-2 1,964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Police Department H210 1,651 FTE
NAT-TCR County Market #518 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Omega Protein, Inc 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Perfection Group, Inc., Cincinnati 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Harlan 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE S11184 - Indy West Transport Clayton 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE 243006-Markham | IL | MDW-210 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clinton Healthcare 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE MDWMCCOOKIL 113 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.