Airports, civil, operation and maintenance · Arizona

Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport Authority

Mesa, AZ · ~116 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport Authority runs at 83% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Airports, civil, operation and maintenance workplace, earning a grade C.

Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport Authority: 3.7 TCR = 83% of Airports, civil, operation and maintenance BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport Authority safety composite

Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport Authority scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2019→2021

Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport Authority injury rate improved

Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport Authority's TCR fell 0.5 from 4.8 in 2019 to 4.3 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.15× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=4.8 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=4.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488119 · Mesa, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.7 · 83% of ind

  • DART 4.3 DART
  • RANK #8/28
  • PHOTO MSY MSY
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~116 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MSY MSY (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport Authority in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport Authority averages 3.7 TCR (83% of the Airports, civil, operation and maintenance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport Authority TCR series: 2019=4.8 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=4.3 · BLS 4.5

Where Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport Authority falls in its industry

1,555 Airports, civil, operation and establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 28 Airports, civil, operation and employers in Arizona.

Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport Authority (116 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport Authority
Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport Authority (116 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport Authority has more employees than the Airports, civil, operation and maintenan median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.3 4.3 4 0 0
2020 2.1 2.1 2 0 0
2019 4.8 4.8 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488119 · AZ · Mesa

1,555 Airports, civil, operation and maintenance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 565 employers in Mesa, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MSY MSY 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 9123-PHL-PRIMEFLIGHT AVIATION SERVICES, INC. 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR EWR-SCS 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Unifi Aviation Services : CLE - Cleveland 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Southwest Energy Solutions (South / TEP) 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spectra Electrical Services 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lucid Motors Gila Bend 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Liberty Iron & Metal Southwest, LLC 116 FTE
CITY-NEAR AZ001 4,193 FTE
CITY-NEAR AZAPW9668 AZA - RAMP PAX 3,181 FTE
CITY-NEAR 04-290370278-2 1,964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Police Department H210 1,651 FTE
NAT-TCR Windsor At Orlando Lutheran Towers 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Decatur Park District 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Corolla 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Amerhart Ltd. - Sun Prairie 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE All Battery Sales and Service Inc 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Services 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mountain View Health & Rehab 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spring Hill Health and Rehab 116 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.