Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding · North Carolina

Piedmont Stone Center

Winston Salem, NC · ~38 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Piedmont Stone Center runs at 16% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding workplace, earning a grade A.

Piedmont Stone Center: 0.6 TCR = 16% of Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Piedmont Stone Center safety composite

Piedmont Stone Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Piedmont Stone Center held a steady TCR band

Piedmont Stone Center's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 2.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621493 · Winston Salem, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 16% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/13
  • PHOTO Surgical Care Center
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Surgical Care Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Piedmont Stone Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Piedmont Stone Center averages 0.6 TCR (16% of the Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Piedmont Stone Center TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Piedmont Stone Center falls in its industry

498 Ambulatory surgical centers an establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 13 Ambulatory surgical centers an employers in North Carolina.

Piedmont Stone Center (38 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 6.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Piedmont Stone Center
Piedmont Stone Center (38 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 6.2

Piedmont Stone Center has fewer employees than the Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2020 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621493 · NC · Winston Salem

498 Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 255 employers in Winston Salem, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Surgical Care Center 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carson Tahoe Minden Medical Center 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Texas Health Surgery Center Denton 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Granite State SurgiCenter 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Morganton Hatchery 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harris Energy & Environmental Center 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Enerdyne Power Systems, Inc 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electric Utilities (8100) 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR WFBMC - Winston Campus 13,298 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wake Forest University Health Sciences 3,280 FTE
CITY-NEAR Inmar - 9040 Team Support Center 1,813 FTE
CITY-NEAR Inmar - Team Support Center 859 FTE
NAT-TCR Midwest Region 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Catch of The Day FMVP 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Blue Cube - Russellville Operations 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR All Industrial Electric Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE FUJIFILM North America Corporation- Rochester, NY 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Masonry 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pardeeville, WI - 11 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marietta Wood Supply 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.