Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors · Nebraska

Pierson Wireless Corp.

Omaha, NE · ~86 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pierson Wireless Corp. runs at 51% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

Pierson Wireless Corp.: 1.4 TCR = 51% of Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pierson Wireless Corp. safety composite

Pierson Wireless Corp. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2016→2022

Pierson Wireless Corp. injury rate improved

Pierson Wireless Corp.'s TCR fell 3.9 from 3.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.9 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=0.8 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Omaha, NE AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.4 · 51% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/47
  • PHOTO Doyle Electric, Inc.
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~86 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Doyle Electric, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

Pierson Wireless Corp. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pierson Wireless Corp. averages 1.4 TCR (51% of the Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pierson Wireless Corp. TCR series: 2016=3.9 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=0.8 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Pierson Wireless Corp. falls in its industry

4,550 Telecommunications equipment a establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 47 Telecommunications equipment a employers in Nebraska.

Pierson Wireless Corp. (86 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Pierson Wireless Corp.
Pierson Wireless Corp. (86 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Pierson Wireless Corp. has more employees than the Telecommunications equipment and wiring median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2018 1.6 0.8 2 0 0
2016 3.9 1.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · NE · Omaha

4,550 Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 1,135 employers in Omaha, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Doyle Electric, Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mojave Electric 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mill Plain Electric 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Norstan Communications Inc - Facebook - NAO* 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Daniels Produce, LLC 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Horizontal Boring & Tunneling Co. 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Scott Enterprises 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hydraulics- Lyman 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR Drivers Management LLC/Over the Road Drivers 9,373 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nebraska Medicine 8,728 FTE
CITY-NEAR FUSION MEDICAL STAFFING, LLC 2,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR 61830001 METHODIST HOSPITAL 2,861 FTE
NAT-TCR ADVICS Ohio Manufacturing, Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Southwest Houston Molly Maid, Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR PSSI - 0266 JBS USA - Plainwell 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Quincy Compressor, LLC (Corporate Headquarters) 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Diversicare of Brookhaven 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Public Works - Engineering 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mechanicsburg Senior Care, LLC d/b/a VibraLife Senior Living 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tesla Road 86 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.