Maid services (i.e., cleaning services) · Texas

Southwest Houston Molly Maid, Inc.

Houston, TX · ~30 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Southwest Houston Molly Maid, Inc. runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Maid services (i.e., cleaning services) workplace, earning a grade A.

Southwest Houston Molly Maid, Inc.: 1.4 TCR = 32% of Maid services (i.e., cleaning services) BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Southwest Houston Molly Maid, Inc. safety composite

Southwest Houston Molly Maid, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Southwest Houston Molly Maid, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Southwest Houston Molly Maid, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=6.9 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 32% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #85/417
  • PHOTO QSI Fayetteville
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: QSI Fayetteville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Southwest Houston Molly Maid, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Southwest Houston Molly Maid, Inc. averages 1.4 TCR (32% of the Maid services (i.e., cleaning services) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Southwest Houston Molly Maid, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=6.9 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Southwest Houston Molly Maid, Inc. falls in its industry

4,064 Maid services (i.e., cleaning establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #85 safest of 417 Maid services (i.e., cleaning employers in Texas.

Southwest Houston Molly Maid, Inc. (30 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Southwest Houston Molly Maid, Inc.
Southwest Houston Molly Maid, Inc. (30 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Southwest Houston Molly Maid, Inc. has fewer employees than the Maid services (i.e., cleaning services) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.2 3.2 1 0 0
2018 6.9 6.9 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · TX · Houston

4,064 Maid services (i.e., cleaning services) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR QSI Fayetteville 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Executive Management Services - Harrisburg, PA 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Legacy Commercial Cleaning, LLC - Columbus 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Compass Microsoft Cafe 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE BRAZOS RIVER SOD FARM 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coyote Lake Feeders LLC 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dimmitt Feedyard 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Green Plains Cattle Company LLC - Hereford 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR PSSI - 0266 JBS USA - Plainwell 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Pierson Wireless Corp. 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR ADVICS Ohio Manufacturing, Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Quincy Compressor, LLC (Corporate Headquarters) 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE MCCHC-Anderson 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Columbus Equipment Company-Richfield Branch 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Laurel Growout Office 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG839 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.