Ropes (except wire rope) manufacturing · Georgia

Pigeon Mountain Industries, Inc.

Lafayette, GA · ~34 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pigeon Mountain Industries, Inc. runs at 180% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Ropes (except wire rope) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Pigeon Mountain Industries, Inc.: 5.9 TCR = 180% of Ropes (except wire rope) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pigeon Mountain Industries, Inc. safety composite

Pigeon Mountain Industries, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pigeon Mountain Industries, Inc.: 2.6 → 3.3 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 15.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.55× in 2023

Pigeon Mountain Industries, Inc.'s TCR rose 0.7 from 2.6 in 2016 to 3.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 15.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 314994 · Lafayette, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.9 · 180% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #6/7
  • PHOTO Samson Rope
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Samson Rope (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Pigeon Mountain Industries, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pigeon Mountain Industries, Inc. averages 5.9 TCR (180% of the Ropes (except wire rope) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Pigeon Mountain Industries, Inc. TCR series: 2016=2.6 · 2017=4.2 · 2018=0 · 2019=3 · 2020=15.7 · 2021=9.9 · 2022=8.8 · 2023=3.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Pigeon Mountain Industries, Inc. falls in its industry

31 Ropes (except wire rope) manuf establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 7 Ropes (except wire rope) manuf employers in Georgia.

Pigeon Mountain Industries, Inc. (34 employees, TCR 5.9) among 23 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 110 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 24 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Pigeon Mountain Industries, Inc.
Pigeon Mountain Industries, Inc. (34 employees, TCR 5.9) among 23 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 110 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Pigeon Mountain Industries, Inc. has fewer employees than the Ropes (except wire rope) manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2022 8.8 8.8 3 0 0
2021 9.9 3.3 1 2 0
2020 15.7 3.9 2 2 0
2019 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 4.2 0.0 1 0 0
2016 2.6 2.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

314994 · GA · Lafayette

31 Ropes (except wire rope) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 13 employers in Lafayette, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Samson Rope 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Continental Tires-Aldora Mills Plant 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Teufelberger Fiber Rope Corp 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sterling Rope 6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE SODEXO AT GEORGIA TECH-CATERING 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Albert Manufacturing USA 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Augusta Hospice 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bodycote Thermal Processing Inc. - Covington 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Roper Corporation, Lafayette, GA 2,144 FTE
CITY-NEAR Plant 67 233 FTE
CITY-NEAR Syntec Lafayette 164 FTE
CITY-NEAR IFS LaFayette 113 FTE
NAT-TCR Beltrami County Highway Department 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Spee Dee Delivery Service, Inc - Minot 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Brownsburg Health Care Center 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Eclipse Lighting & Electrical 5.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Merlot Vango Tarping Solutions LLC 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Virginia Episcopal School 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mundo Verde 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greif (IP Kernersville - Adhesives) 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.