Feed supplements, dog and cat, manufacturing · Texas

Pilgrims Mt. Pleasant Protein Conversion

Mt. Pleasant, TX · ~128 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
3.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pilgrims Mt. Pleasant Protein Conversion runs at 153% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Feed supplements, dog and cat, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Pilgrims Mt. Pleasant Protein Conversion: 6.0 TCR = 153% of Feed supplements, dog and cat, manufacturing BLS 3.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pilgrims Mt. Pleasant Protein Conversion safety composite

Pilgrims Mt. Pleasant Protein Conversion scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2023→2024

Pilgrims Mt. Pleasant Protein Conversion injury rate improved

Pilgrims Mt. Pleasant Protein Conversion's TCR fell 1.2 from 6.6 in 2023 to 5.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 6.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=6.6 · 2024=5.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311111 · Mt. Pleasant, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.0 · 153% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #11/16
  • PHOTO Monogram Pet Treats,…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~128 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Monogram Pet Treats, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Pilgrims Mt. Pleasant Protein Conversion in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pilgrims Mt. Pleasant Protein Conversion averages 6.0 TCR (153% of the Feed supplements, dog and cat, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pilgrims Mt. Pleasant Protein Conversion TCR series: 2023=6.6 · 2024=5.3 · BLS 3.9

Where Pilgrims Mt. Pleasant Protein Conversion falls in its industry

302 Feed supplements, dog and cat, establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 16 Feed supplements, dog and cat, employers in Texas.

Pilgrims Mt. Pleasant Protein Conversion (128 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 103 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Pilgrims Mt. Pleasant Protein Conversion
Pilgrims Mt. Pleasant Protein Conversion (128 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 103 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Pilgrims Mt. Pleasant Protein Conversion has more employees than the Feed supplements, dog and cat, manufactu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.3 0.8 5 2 0
2023 6.6 2.9 7 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311111 · TX · Mt. Pleasant

302 Feed supplements, dog and cat, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 28 employers in Mt. Pleasant, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Monogram Pet Treats, LLC 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR NPIC 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wet Pet 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR AFB International Aurora 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Glen Flora 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Alamo Water Supply Corporation 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE AUS1-DWH-AUSTIN DIVISION 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE CSA Construction Inc. 128 FTE
CITY-NEAR PILGRIMS MT PLEASANT WEST PLANT 1,543 FTE
CITY-NEAR PILGRIMS MT. PLESANT EAST PLANT 559 FTE
CITY-NEAR PILGRIMS MT PLEASANT PREPARED FOODS 479 FTE
CITY-NEAR PSSI / PILGRIM'S CORP - MT. PLEASANT PREPARED 175 FTE
NAT-TCR Procare Landscape Management Inc 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hyatt Regency Reston 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Petro Long Island - Hicksville 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Atom Banana Inc. 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Christian Health Center Hopkinsville 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE Knife River Care Center 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE Powell County Memorial Hospital Association, Inc. DBA Deer Lodge Medical Center 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thompson Seattle 128 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.