Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, frozen) processing · Georgia

Pilgrim's Pride Fresh Processing

Athens, GA · ~1,137 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pilgrim's Pride Fresh Processing runs at 84% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, frozen) processing workplace, earning a grade C.

Pilgrim's Pride Fresh Processing: 2.8 TCR = 84% of Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, frozen) processing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pilgrim's Pride Fresh Processing safety composite

Pilgrim's Pride Fresh Processing scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 54%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pilgrim's Pride Fresh Processing: 2.0 → 3.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 3.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.27× in 2024

Pilgrim's Pride Fresh Processing's TCR rose 1.3 from 2.0 in 2020 to 3.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311615 · Athens, GA AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 84% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #34/67
  • PHOTO Benson Ave Plant
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 107 inj
  • SIZE ~1,137 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Benson Ave Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Pilgrim's Pride Fresh Processing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pilgrim's Pride Fresh Processing averages 2.8 TCR (84% of the Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, frozen) processing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pilgrim's Pride Fresh Processing TCR series: 2020=2 · 2021=3 · 2022=3 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=3.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Pilgrim's Pride Fresh Processing falls in its industry

509 Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #34 safest of 67 Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, employers in Georgia.

Pilgrim's Pride Fresh Processing (1,137 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Pilgrim's Pride Fresh Processing
Pilgrim's Pride Fresh Processing (1,137 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Pilgrim's Pride Fresh Processing has more employees than the Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, fr median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.2 0.8 15 28 0
2023 2.5 1.3 17 9 0
2022 3.0 1.9 24 10 0
2021 3.0 2.0 27 6 0
2020 2.0 1.4 24 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311615 · GA · Athens

509 Poultry (e.g., canned, cooked, fresh, frozen) processing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 187 employers in Athens, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Benson Ave Plant 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hatchery 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR George's Springdale Further Processing Plant 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Claxton Poultry Farms 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE WellStar North Fulton Hospital 1,137 FTE
STATE-SIZE Koch Foods-Cumming 1,138 FTE
STATE-SIZE St. Joseph's Hospital 1,138 FTE
STATE-SIZE Athens Facility 1,140 FTE
CITY-NEAR Piedmont Athens Regional Hospital 2,805 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Health Care System-SMHCS-GA 1,509 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST.MARYS HEALTHCARE SYSTEM 1,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Health Care System Inc.- Athens 1,187 FTE
NAT-TCR MIDWEST 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR PACIFIC 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Central District Services 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Hutchinson Sealing Systems 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rockwell Automation- Mequon WI (MEQ) 1,137 FTE
NAT-SIZE Titan Ag Services, Inc. 1,137 FTE
NAT-SIZE NP Palace LLC - dba Palace Station Hotel & Casino 1,137 FTE
NAT-SIZE North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : SJC7 1,137 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.