Chickens, slaughtering and dressing · Tennessee

Pilgrims Processing and Administration

Name: Pilgrims Processing and Administration Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Chattanooga, TN · ~347 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

F
Failing Safety Record: 6.6
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pilgrims Processing and Administration runs at 201% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Chickens, slaughtering and dressing workplace, earning a grade F.

Pilgrims Processing and Administration: 6.6 TCR = 201% of Chickens, slaughtering and dressing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pilgrims Processing and Administration safety composite

Pilgrims Processing and Administration scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): F 6.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers
DART rate: F 2.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2023→2024

Pilgrims Processing and Administration injury rate improved

Pilgrims Processing and Administration's TCR fell 0.6 from 7.0 in 2023 to 6.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 7.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=7.0 · 2024=6.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311615 · Chattanooga, TN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.6 · 201% of ind

DART 2.7 DART
RANK #10/12
PHOTO Harbeson DE Processi…
BOOK 2y book
INJ 13 inj
SIZE ~347 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Harbeson DE Processing Facility (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Harbeson DE Pr

6.7
This site

6.6
OKF Muldrow Pr

6.6
Koch's Turkey

6.6
Shelbyville Pl

6.5

What this shows Pilgrims Processing and Administration averages 6.6 TCR (201% of the Chickens, slaughtering and dressing BLS benchmark).

Pilgrims Processing and Administration TCR series: 2023=7 · 2024=6.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Pilgrims Processing and Administration falls in its industry

509 Chickens, slaughtering and dre establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

Grade F

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 12 Chickens, slaughtering and dre employers in Tennessee.

Pilgrims Processing and Administration (347 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Pilgrims Processing and Administration has fewer employees than the Chickens, slaughtering and dressing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2024	6.3	2.7	9	10	0
2023	7.0	0.0	4	16	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311615 · TN · Chattanooga

509 Chickens, slaughtering and dressing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 695 employers in Chattanooga, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Harbeson DE Processing Facility	HARBESON, DE	6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	OKF Muldrow Processing	MULDROW, OK	6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Koch's Turkey Farm	TAMAQUA, PA	6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Shelbyville Plant	SHELBYVILLE, TN	6.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE	WM 177	PARIS	347 FTE
STATE-SIZE	WM 3017	SPRING HILL	347 FTE
STATE-SIZE	FXM	MEMPHIS	347 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Nashville Predators, LLC	NASHVILLE	347 FTE
CITY-NEAR	CHATTANOOGA COKE	Chattanooga	8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR	CHATTANOOGA FOOD	Chattanooga	8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR	USXpress	Chattanooga	7,385 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Cardiology GB	Chattanooga	6,606 FTE
NAT-TCR	Crescent Landing at Hattiesburg	Hattiesburg, MS	6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	Polyvinyl Films Inc.	Sutton, MA	6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	Incra - Crawfordsville	Crawfordsville, IN	6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	Wyche - Cheyenne	Cheyenne, WY	6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Sensus-Uniontown	Uniontown, PA	347 FTE
NAT-SIZE	SMS Staffing Solutions, Inc.	Detroit, MI	347 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Viking Industrial	Rossville, GA	347 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Hospitality Ventures LLC	Cary, NC	347 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.