Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Mississippi

Crescent Landing at Hattiesburg

Hattiesburg, MS · ~43 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Crescent Landing at Hattiesburg runs at 175% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Crescent Landing at Hattiesburg: 6.6 TCR = 175% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Crescent Landing at Hattiesburg safety composite

Crescent Landing at Hattiesburg scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−68.3

2022→2024

Crescent Landing at Hattiesburg injury rate improved

Crescent Landing at Hattiesburg's TCR fell 68.3 from 74.8 in 2022 to 6.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 74.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=74.8 · 2023=6.8 · 2024=6.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Hattiesburg, MS ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.6 · 175% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #23/29
  • PHOTO Braemar Living at Wa…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Braemar Living at Wallkill (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Crescent Landing at Hattiesburg in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Crescent Landing at Hattiesburg averages 6.6 TCR (175% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Crescent Landing at Hattiesburg TCR series: 2022=74.8 · 2023=6.8 · 2024=6.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Crescent Landing at Hattiesburg falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 29 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Mississippi.

Crescent Landing at Hattiesburg (43 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Crescent Landing at Hattiesburg
Crescent Landing at Hattiesburg (43 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Crescent Landing at Hattiesburg has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.4 0.0 2 0 0
2023 6.8 3.4 2 0 0
2022 74.8 74.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MS · Hattiesburg

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 186 employers in Hattiesburg, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Braemar Living at Wallkill 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gardens of Pamlico 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cedarbrook of Northville 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 414 - Aspire Senior Living 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Peco Farms Sebastopol Hatchery 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coahoma Electric Power Association-Tunica 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE M&M Pipeline Acquisition, LLC dba M&M Pipeline 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Peco Foods- West Point MS 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR HATTIESBURG FOOD 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hattiesburg 4,161 FTE
CITY-NEAR Processing Plant 1,173 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mar-Jac Poultry MS LLC - Processing Plant 1,163 FTE
NAT-TCR Polyvinyl Films Inc. 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Incra - Crawfordsville 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Wyche - Cheyenne 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Interamerican Foods Corporation 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Arlington Heights, Il 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oswego Harbor Power 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE James Candy Company, LLC 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chicago 10247 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.