Property owners' associations · California

Pine Mountain Club Property Owners Association

Pmc, CA · ~71 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pine Mountain Club Property Owners Association runs at 59% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Property owners' associations workplace, earning a grade B.

Pine Mountain Club Property Owners Association: 1.2 TCR = 59% of Property owners' associations BLS 2.1 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pine Mountain Club Property Owners Association safety composite

Pine Mountain Club Property Owners Association scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
C 0

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pine Mountain Club Property Owners Association: 1.8 → 3.1 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 1834.9 TCR · DART/TCR 2.52× in 2024

Pine Mountain Club Property Owners Association's TCR rose 1.3 from 1.8 in 2020 to 3.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 1834.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 2.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 813990 · Pmc, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.2 · 59% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #1/4
  • PHOTO Vistana Beach Club
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Vistana Beach Club (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Pine Mountain Club Property Owners Association in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pine Mountain Club Property Owners Association averages 1.2 TCR (59% of the Property owners' associations BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Pine Mountain Club Property Owners Association TCR series: 2020=1.8 · 2021=1834.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 2.1

Where Pine Mountain Club Property Owners Association falls in its industry

22 Property owners' associations establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 4 Property owners' associations employers in California.

Pine Mountain Club Property Owners Association (71 employees, TCR 1.2) among 8 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate NV - Summerlin Association ManagementBIGHORN Homeowners AssociationFontanelleGirl Scouts - Arizona Cactus-Pine Council, IncSUN CITY PALM DESERT COMMUNITY ASSOCIATIONVistana Beach ClubHealth and Recreation Center21st Century CoopPine Mountain Club Property Owners Association
Pine Mountain Club Property Owners Association (71 employees, TCR 1.2) among 8 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Pine Mountain Club Property Owners Association has more employees than the Property owners' associations median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 3.1 1 1 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1834.9 1834.9 1 0 0
2020 1.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

813990 · CA · Pmc

22 Property owners' associations employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Vistana Beach Club 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 120 Old Post Road Condominium 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR HOAMCO 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR NV - Summerlin Association Management 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Trevista Antioch Op Co LLC 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE iDeliver Ontime LLC 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Extreme Delivery Services LLC 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Regan Roofing, Inc. 71 FTE
NAT-TCR Nabholz Construction Corporation 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Aktion Parks-Orlando Watersports Complex 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Public Services Building 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Shriners Hospitals for Children Texas 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Holman Logistics - DuPont 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Landry's Professional Lawn and Landscape, Inc. 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE CMS Ponce 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wyman & Simpson, Inc 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.