Waste collection services, nonhazardous solid · Maine

Pine Tree Waste - Scarborough

Scarborough, ME · ~91 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.1
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pine Tree Waste - Scarborough runs at 579% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Waste collection services, nonhazardous solid workplace, earning a grade F.

Pine Tree Waste - Scarborough: 15.1 TCR = 579% of Waste collection services, nonhazardous solid BLS 2.6 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pine Tree Waste - Scarborough safety composite

Pine Tree Waste - Scarborough scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 19.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pine Tree Waste - Scarborough: 19.2 → 24.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 24.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.29× in 2024

Pine Tree Waste - Scarborough's TCR rose 5.1 from 19.2 in 2017 to 24.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · Scarborough, ME ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.1 · 579% of ind

  • DART 19.4 DART
  • RANK #11/15
  • PHOTO Stericycle - Southam…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 112 inj
  • SIZE ~91 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Stericycle - Southampton,PA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maine employers → · Look up another →

Pine Tree Waste - Scarborough in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pine Tree Waste - Scarborough averages 15.1 TCR (579% of the Waste collection services, nonhazardous solid BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pine Tree Waste - Scarborough TCR series: 2017=19.2 · 2018=12.6 · 2019=14.1 · 2020=13.9 · 2021=16.9 · 2022=7.4 · 2023=12 · 2024=24.3 · BLS 2.6

Where Pine Tree Waste - Scarborough falls in its industry

2,322 Waste collection services, non establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maine alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 15 Waste collection services, non employers in Maine.

Pine Tree Waste - Scarborough (91 employees, TCR 15.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Pine Tree Waste - Scarborough
Pine Tree Waste - Scarborough (91 employees, TCR 15.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Pine Tree Waste - Scarborough has more employees than the Waste collection services, nonhazardous median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 24.3 19.4 25 0 0
2023 12.0 7.4 9 4 0
2022 7.4 6.5 8 0 0
2021 16.9 15.2 18 1 0
2020 13.9 11.0 18 1 0
2019 14.1 13.0 11 2 0
2018 12.6 10.3 11 0 0
2017 19.2 16.3 12 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · ME · Scarborough

2,322 Waste collection services, nonhazardous solid employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,397 rated employers in Maine with headcount on file · 71 employers in Scarborough, ME · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Stericycle - Southampton,PA 15.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Draw Enterprises III 15.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marck Recycling & Waste Services of NEA 15.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eagan Facility 15.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE JF2, LLC 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maine Wild Blueberry co 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5472-NAI-0033-0033-02547 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE 8439 91 FTE
CITY-NEAR TK Elevator Scarborough 3,677 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSCSCA 909 FTE
CITY-NEAR ARDx Scarborough 666 FTE
CITY-NEAR ID Scarborough 644 FTE
NAT-TCR The Springs at Lafayette 15.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Challenger Harvest, Inc. 15.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Stericycle - Southampton,PA 15.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Girard Wood Products Orting 15.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Precision Strip, Inc. Middletown 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Walden 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chris Candies, Inc. 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Coast Dredging 91 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.