Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing · North Carolina

Pineville, NC Container Graphics Corporation

Pineville, NC · ~44 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pineville, NC Container Graphics Corporation runs at 66% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Pineville, NC Container Graphics Corporation: 2.2 TCR = 66% of Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pineville, NC Container Graphics Corporation safety composite

Pineville, NC Container Graphics Corporation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2016→2018

Pineville, NC Container Graphics Corporation injury rate improved

Pineville, NC Container Graphics Corporation's TCR fell 2.2 from 4.4 in 2016 to 2.2 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.4 TCR. In 2018, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.4 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333514 · Pineville, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 66% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #5/14
  • PHOTO Tooling Dynamics LLC
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tooling Dynamics LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Pineville, NC Container Graphics Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pineville, NC Container Graphics Corporation averages 2.2 TCR (66% of the Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pineville, NC Container Graphics Corporation TCR series: 2016=4.4 · 2017=0 · 2018=2.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Pineville, NC Container Graphics Corporation falls in its industry

387 Cutting dies, metalworking, ma establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 14 Cutting dies, metalworking, ma employers in North Carolina.

Pineville, NC Container Graphics Corporation (44 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Pineville, NC Container Graphics Corporation
Pineville, NC Container Graphics Corporation (44 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Pineville, NC Container Graphics Corporation has fewer employees than the Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.4 2.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333514 · NC · Pineville

387 Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 77 employers in Pineville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tooling Dynamics LLC 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Intra Corporation 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR General Carbide Corporation 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kuhn Tool & Die Co. 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sleepy Creek Farms 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE ALBEMARLE WMSTN 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Morganton 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aqua Services, Inc. - Cary 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0007-Atrium Health Pineville 1,725 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0007-CHS Pineville 1,725 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - CLT6 393 FTE
CITY-NEAR FedEx 626 EAGLETON DOWN ROAD 243 FTE
NAT-TCR Daws Manufacturing Company, Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sienna Crest Assisted Living, Inc.-Fort Atkinson 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Regional Zone - Austell, GA 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Chs Ems 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Decostar Distribution Center 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Horizon Ethanol dba Poet Biorefinery 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elzinga & Volkers Professional Services, Inc. 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Compassionate Care Hospice of Parsippany 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.