Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing · Pennsylvania

General Carbide Corporation

Name: General Carbide Corporation Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Greensburgh, PA · ~225 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

B
Good Safety Record: 2.2
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

General Carbide Corporation runs at 66% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

General Carbide Corporation: 2.2 TCR = 66% of Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

General Carbide Corporation safety composite

General Carbide Corporation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): C 2.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers
DART rate: F 1.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

General Carbide Corporation: 1.6 → 2.8 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 2.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.86× in 2020

General Carbide Corporation's TCR rose 1.2 from 1.6 in 2019 to 2.8 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0.86× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333514 · Greensburgh, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 66% of ind

DART 1.9 DART
RANK #17/39
PHOTO Tooling Dynamics LLC
BOOK 2y book
INJ 9 inj
SIZE ~225 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tooling Dynamics LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

This site

2.2
Tooling Dynami

2.2
Intra Corporat

2.2
Pineville, NC

2.2
Triangle Tool

2.1

What this shows General Carbide Corporation averages 2.2 TCR (66% of the Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

General Carbide Corporation TCR series: 2019=1.6 · 2020=2.8 · BLS 3.3

Where General Carbide Corporation falls in its industry

387 Cutting dies, metalworking, ma establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

Grade B

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 39 Cutting dies, metalworking, ma employers in Pennsylvania.

General Carbide Corporation (225 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4

General Carbide Corporation has more employees than the Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2020	2.8	1.9	6	0	0
2019	1.6	0.4	3	1	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333514 · PA · Greensburgh

387 Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Tooling Dynamics LLC	YORK, PA	2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Intra Corporation	WESTLAND, MI	2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Pineville, NC Container Graphics Corporation	PINEVILLE, NC	2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Triangle Tool Division	ERIE, PA	2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE	VHG	MCADOO	225 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Joe Jurgielewicz & Son, Ltd	SHARTLESVILLE	225 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Aqua Services, Inc. - Bryn Mawr	BRYN MAWR	225 FTE
STATE-SIZE	JTM Foods LLC	ERIE	225 FTE
NAT-TCR	Mitsubishi Chemical Composites America, Inc.	Chesapeake, VA	2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Admin	Cambridge, MN	2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Accella Polyurethane Systems LLC - Rancho	Rancho Cucamonga, CA	2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Insulfoam - Aurora	Aurora, CO	2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Tonkin Parts Center	Portland, OR	225 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Saint Paul Regional Water Services	Saint Paul, MN	225 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Schindler Holland R&D	Holland, OH	225 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Riviana Foods Freeport	Freeport, TX	225 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.