Nursing homes · Virginia

Piney Forest Health and Rehabiliation Center

Danville, VA · ~143 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.9
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Piney Forest Health and Rehabiliation Center runs at 91% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade C.

Piney Forest Health and Rehabiliation Center: 5.9 TCR = 91% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Piney Forest Health and Rehabiliation Center safety composite

Piney Forest Health and Rehabiliation Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.2

2016→2020

Piney Forest Health and Rehabiliation Center injury rate improved

Piney Forest Health and Rehabiliation Center's TCR fell 4.2 from 4.6 in 2016 to 0.4 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 19.4 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.07× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.6 · 2017=19.4 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=0.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Danville, VA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 5.9 · 91% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #167/343
  • PHOTO The Heights of Tyler
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~143 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Heights of Tyler (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Piney Forest Health and Rehabiliation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Piney Forest Health and Rehabiliation Center averages 5.9 TCR (91% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Piney Forest Health and Rehabiliation Center TCR series: 2016=4.6 · 2017=19.4 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=0.4 · BLS 6.5

Where Piney Forest Health and Rehabiliation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing homes establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #167 safest of 343 Nursing homes employers in Virginia.

Piney Forest Health and Rehabiliation Center (143 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Piney Forest Health and Rehabiliation Center
Piney Forest Health and Rehabiliation Center (143 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Piney Forest Health and Rehabiliation Center has more employees than the Nursing homes median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.4 0.4 4 0 0
2019 2.6 1.8 3 0 0
2018 2.6 2.6 3 0 0
2017 19.4 19.4 2 0 0
2016 4.6 3.7 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · VA · Danville

15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 102 employers in Danville, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Heights of Tyler 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heritage Health Care 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR KING DAVID CENTER FOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Texhoma Christian Care Center, Inc. 5.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE ORCHARDS 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE PENINSULA-HAMPTON 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE Anderson Mechanical Services Inc 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kerry 143 FTE
CITY-NEAR Goodyear Danville 2,054 FTE
CITY-NEAR A408797 2,029 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sovah Health Danville 1,145 FTE
CITY-NEAR Caesars Virginia 852 FTE
NAT-TCR Eau Claire Hospice 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Mount Prospect Academy - Residential 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : DFW6 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR E.M. Tharp 5.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Quaker Windows and Doors Wood Plant 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Envision 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Universidad Ana G. Mendez - Yauco 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jackson 100 143 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.