Distribution of natural gas · Arizona

Pinnacle Peak Ops Cntr 0042-Fac52

Phoenix, AZ · ~82 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.1
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pinnacle Peak Ops Cntr 0042-Fac52 runs at 926% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of natural gas workplace, earning a grade F.

Pinnacle Peak Ops Cntr 0042-Fac52: 11.1 TCR = 926% of Distribution of natural gas BLS 1.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pinnacle Peak Ops Cntr 0042-Fac52 safety composite

Pinnacle Peak Ops Cntr 0042-Fac52 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.5

2016→2021

Pinnacle Peak Ops Cntr 0042-Fac52 injury rate improved

Pinnacle Peak Ops Cntr 0042-Fac52's TCR fell 10.5 from 13.0 in 2016 to 2.5 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 15.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=13.0 · 2017=14.4 · 2018=15.9 · 2019=12.4 · 2020=8.4 · 2021=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221210 · Phoenix, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.1 · 926% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #19/19
  • PHOTO Glendale Base - Bld:…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 56 inj
  • SIZE ~82 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Glendale Base - Bld: 0335 - 15 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Pinnacle Peak Ops Cntr 0042-Fac52 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pinnacle Peak Ops Cntr 0042-Fac52 averages 11.1 TCR (926% of the Distribution of natural gas BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pinnacle Peak Ops Cntr 0042-Fac52 TCR series: 2016=13 · 2017=14.4 · 2018=15.9 · 2019=12.4 · 2020=8.4 · 2021=2.5 · BLS 1.2

Where Pinnacle Peak Ops Cntr 0042-Fac52 falls in its industry

1,153 Distribution of natural gas establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 19 Distribution of natural gas employers in Arizona.

Pinnacle Peak Ops Cntr 0042-Fac52 (82 employees, TCR 11.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Pinnacle Peak Ops Cntr 0042-Fac52
Pinnacle Peak Ops Cntr 0042-Fac52 (82 employees, TCR 11.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Pinnacle Peak Ops Cntr 0042-Fac52 has more employees than the Distribution of natural gas median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.5 0.0 2 0 0
2020 8.4 8.4 6 0 0
2019 12.4 12.4 10 0 0
2018 15.9 12.5 14 0 0
2017 14.4 11.1 13 0 0
2016 13.0 10.6 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221210 · AZ · Phoenix

1,153 Distribution of natural gas employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Glendale Base - Bld: 0335 - 15 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CenterPoint Energy - Chickasha 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sharon SC 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Orchard Park SC 11.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Santa Cruz Farm 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electric Utility 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE CAZ-Pinnacle Peak Operations 0042-FAC52 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Canyon State Enterprises, LLC 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR Locations 7 Chula Vista 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Trailpoint Village 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Cf Transport 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Bed Bath and Beyond Alpharetta 11.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Swg Carson Dist Ops Cntr 0024-Fac10 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Talladega Superspeedway 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pahrump Health & Rehab 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Seneca Park Zoo Society 82 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.