Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing · California

Pinnacle Precision Sheet Metal

Anaheim, CA · ~114 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pinnacle Precision Sheet Metal runs at 128% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Pinnacle Precision Sheet Metal: 4.2 TCR = 128% of Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pinnacle Precision Sheet Metal safety composite

Pinnacle Precision Sheet Metal scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2017→2024

Pinnacle Precision Sheet Metal injury rate improved

Pinnacle Precision Sheet Metal's TCR fell 0.7 from 4.3 in 2017 to 3.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 8.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.3 · 2019=3.9 · 2021=4.2 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=8.6 · 2024=3.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · Anaheim, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.2 · 128% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #38/98
  • PHOTO Lochard
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~114 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lochard (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Pinnacle Precision Sheet Metal in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pinnacle Precision Sheet Metal averages 4.2 TCR (128% of the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pinnacle Precision Sheet Metal TCR series: 2017=4.3 · 2019=3.9 · 2021=4.2 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=8.6 · 2024=3.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Pinnacle Precision Sheet Metal falls in its industry

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stamp establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #38 safest of 98 Sheet metal work (except stamp employers in California.

Pinnacle Precision Sheet Metal (114 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Pinnacle Precision Sheet Metal
Pinnacle Precision Sheet Metal (114 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Pinnacle Precision Sheet Metal has more employees than the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.6 0.0 4 0 0
2023 8.6 1.9 0 9 0
2022 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2021 4.2 0.8 5 0 0
2019 3.9 0.8 5 0 0
2017 4.3 0.0 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · CA · Anaheim

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 630 employers in Anaheim, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lochard 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Four C's Construction 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tongrun International 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Royston Hamilton 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wonderful Orchards-Belridge 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Olivarez Honey Bees 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE SIERRA AG SERVICES, INC 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE PURO VIDA BERRIES 114 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S. Inc., dba Disneyland Resort 38,057 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. d/b/a Disneyland Resort 28,066 FTE
CITY-NEAR Doubletree By Hilton Suites Anaheim 1,933 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08881053 ORANGE CO ANAHEIM MEDICAL CENTER 1,658 FTE
NAT-TCR 5260 Paragould 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR S&H Lockwood 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Schlagel Manufacturing Inc. 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 1201-Navicent Health Medical Center 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE A a Huddle LLC 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Texas Instruments SFAB1 Base Building #2128 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Twin Cities Orthopedics - Eagan 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Minnesota Twist Drill 114 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.