Orthopedic physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Minnesota

Twin Cities Orthopedics - Eagan

Eagan, MN · ~114 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Twin Cities Orthopedics - Eagan runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Orthopedic physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade B.

Twin Cities Orthopedics - Eagan: 2.3 TCR = 61% of Orthopedic physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Twin Cities Orthopedics - Eagan safety composite

Twin Cities Orthopedics - Eagan scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Twin Cities Orthopedics - Eagan: 2.2 → 3.5 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 3.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.9× in 2024

Twin Cities Orthopedics - Eagan's TCR rose 1.2 from 2.2 in 2022 to 3.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.9× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Eagan, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 61% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #106/419
  • PHOTO Northern Light Devel…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~114 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Northern Light Developmental Pediatrics (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Twin Cities Orthopedics - Eagan in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Twin Cities Orthopedics - Eagan averages 2.3 TCR (61% of the Orthopedic physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Twin Cities Orthopedics - Eagan TCR series: 2022=2.2 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=3.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Twin Cities Orthopedics - Eagan falls in its industry

2,836 Orthopedic physicians' offices establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #106 safest of 419 Orthopedic physicians' offices employers in Minnesota.

Twin Cities Orthopedics - Eagan (114 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Twin Cities Orthopedics - Eagan
Twin Cities Orthopedics - Eagan (114 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Twin Cities Orthopedics - Eagan has more employees than the Orthopedic physicians' offices (e.g., ce median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.5 2.1 5 0 0
2023 1.2 0.0 1 0 0
2022 2.2 1.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · MN · Eagan

2,836 Orthopedic physicians' offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 285 employers in Eagan, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Northern Light Developmental Pediatrics 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meritus Enterprises 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mercy Inpatient Meical Associates (MIMA) 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southdale Phys Bldg IAM RX 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Coon Rapids MND5 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE HM Cragg 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Master Electric 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Morris Packaging, LLC 114 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prime Therapeutics - Prime Landing & Remote 6,596 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thomson Reuters - Eagan 4,474 FTE
CITY-NEAR MSPXL0001 MSPXL0001 4,156 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lifeworks Services, Inc 3,663 FTE
NAT-TCR Preferred Mechanical Group 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Seattle Maintenance Alaska 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 3646 S Boulevard Charlotte 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR The Blakley Corporation 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Harris & Hart, Inc.-Intel Eagle Project 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pinnacle Precision Sheet Metal 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE A a Huddle LLC 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Texas Instruments SFAB1 Base Building #2128 114 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.