Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors · Arkansas

Pinnacle Telecom

Fort Smith, AR · ~29 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pinnacle Telecom runs at 64% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

Pinnacle Telecom: 1.8 TCR = 64% of Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pinnacle Telecom safety composite

Pinnacle Telecom scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.6

2019→2020

Pinnacle Telecom injury rate improved

Pinnacle Telecom's TCR fell 3.6 from 3.6 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.6 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=3.6 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Fort Smith, AR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 64% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #16/46
  • PHOTO Brooks-Berry-Haynie …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brooks-Berry-Haynie & Associates GA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Pinnacle Telecom in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pinnacle Telecom averages 1.8 TCR (64% of the Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pinnacle Telecom TCR series: 2019=3.6 · 2020=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Pinnacle Telecom falls in its industry

4,550 Telecommunications equipment a establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 46 Telecommunications equipment a employers in Arkansas.

Pinnacle Telecom (29 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Pinnacle Telecom
Pinnacle Telecom (29 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Pinnacle Telecom has fewer employees than the Telecommunications equipment and wiring median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · AR · Fort Smith

4,550 Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 249 employers in Fort Smith, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brooks-Berry-Haynie & Associates GA 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Electrical Corporation of America, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hi-Tech Electric - New Orleans 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR RESA Power - Blaine 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Entergy Russellville 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE East Harding Construction 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE ACE Glass Construction - NW 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Electrical 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR MERCY HOSPITAL FORT SMITH 1,944 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABB Motors and Mechanical, Inc. - Fort Smith 1,298 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fort Smith - 5713 RS Boreham Jr Street 985 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Health Medical Center - Fort Smith 970 FTE
NAT-TCR Assessor/ Recorder 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ne25th-Opi-Omaha-25th Street 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Enterprise Rent-A-Car-0399 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Pearland Medical Center 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE TCS:TC432 - TC432-Dallas, TX 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE GCI:GCDUR - GCDUR-Durham, NC 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE ECC:EC010 - EC010-Bessemer, AL - 0100 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ameritech Industries, Inc. dba American Propeller Service 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.