Carpentry, framing · Pennsylvania

Pioneer Pole Buildings

Schuylkill Haven, PA · ~192 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pioneer Pole Buildings runs at 378% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Carpentry, framing workplace, earning a grade F.

Pioneer Pole Buildings: 10.6 TCR = 378% of Carpentry, framing BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pioneer Pole Buildings safety composite

Pioneer Pole Buildings scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−13.3

2017→2024

Pioneer Pole Buildings injury rate improved

Pioneer Pole Buildings's TCR fell 13.3 from 17.6 in 2017 to 4.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 17.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=17.6 · 2018=16.3 · 2019=16.4 · 2020=9.9 · 2022=5.3 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=4.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238130 · Schuylkill Haven, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 10.6 · 378% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #11/12
  • PHOTO Contract Supply Inc.
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 135 inj
  • SIZE ~192 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Contract Supply Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Pioneer Pole Buildings in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pioneer Pole Buildings averages 10.6 TCR (378% of the Carpentry, framing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pioneer Pole Buildings TCR series: 2017=17.6 · 2018=16.3 · 2019=16.4 · 2020=9.9 · 2022=5.3 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=4.2 · BLS 2.8

Where Pioneer Pole Buildings falls in its industry

387 Carpentry, framing establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 12 Carpentry, framing employers in Pennsylvania.

Pioneer Pole Buildings (192 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Pioneer Pole Buildings
Pioneer Pole Buildings (192 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Pioneer Pole Buildings has more employees than the Carpentry, framing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.2 4.2 22 0 0
2023 4.5 3.8 24 0 0
2022 5.3 4.3 26 0 0
2020 9.9 7.8 14 0 0
2019 16.4 16.4 17 0 0
2018 16.3 14.2 16 0 0
2017 17.6 9.9 16 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238130 · PA · Schuylkill Haven

387 Carpentry, framing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 21 employers in Schuylkill Haven, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Contract Supply Inc. 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spahn & Rose Manufacturing 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tristar Carpentry-VU 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dallas FS (SSS, SAT) 10.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Waggoner Construction Inc. 192 FTE
STATE-SIZE NAPP Reading Box - 014 192 FTE
STATE-SIZE The AZEK Company - 888 N Keyser 192 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carlisle Interconnect Technologies 192 FTE
CITY-NEAR EVANS DELIVERY COMPANY INC 229 FTE
CITY-NEAR Draka Cableteq USA 182 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cardinal Systems, Inc. 159 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prysmian Group Schuylkill Haven 152 FTE
NAT-TCR Sunshine Canyon Landfill - Republic Services 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 1265 PYP Anaheim 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Grand Rapids Metaltek Inc. 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR La Cosecha Food Service, LLC 10.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ball Beverage Pkg 157 Tampa 192 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ernie Ball Inc. 192 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dakota City Hides 192 FTE
NAT-SIZE S03893 - WM of Collier County 192 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.