332431 Aluminum cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing · Florida

Ball Beverage Pkg 157 Tampa

Tampa, FL · ~192 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ball Beverage Pkg 157 Tampa runs at 93% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical 332431 Aluminum cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Ball Beverage Pkg 157 Tampa: 3.1 TCR = 93% of 332431 Aluminum cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ball Beverage Pkg 157 Tampa safety composite

Ball Beverage Pkg 157 Tampa scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2017→2024

Ball Beverage Pkg 157 Tampa injury rate improved

Ball Beverage Pkg 157 Tampa's TCR fell 3.4 from 6.7 in 2017 to 3.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.7 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=3.7 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=4.2 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332431 · Tampa, FL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 93% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #4/5
  • PHOTO Ball Metalpack - Col…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 36 inj
  • SIZE ~192 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ball Metalpack - Columbus, OH (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Ball Beverage Pkg 157 Tampa in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ball Beverage Pkg 157 Tampa averages 3.1 TCR (93% of the 332431 Aluminum cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ball Beverage Pkg 157 Tampa TCR series: 2017=6.7 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.7 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=4.2 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=3.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Ball Beverage Pkg 157 Tampa falls in its industry

217 332431 Aluminum cans, light g establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 5 332431 Aluminum cans, light g employers in Florida.

Ball Beverage Pkg 157 Tampa (192 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 117 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Ball Beverage Pkg 157 Tampa
Ball Beverage Pkg 157 Tampa (192 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 117 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Ball Beverage Pkg 157 Tampa has more employees than the 332431 Aluminum cans, light gauge metal median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.3 1.4 5 2 0
2023 3.1 0.9 4 3 0
2022 1.5 1.1 4 0 0
2021 4.2 1.4 9 0 0
2020 2.2 1.1 1 3 0
2019 3.7 1.9 4 2 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 6.7 2.4 9 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332431 · FL · Tampa

217 332431 Aluminum cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,659 employers in Tampa, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ball Metalpack - Columbus, OH 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ardagh Metal Beverage-Chicago 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ball Tinplate 023-Springdale 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Columbus Sonoco Metal Packing - D143 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Petticoat Schmitt Civil Contractors 192 FTE
STATE-SIZE Endo-Therapeutics, Inc. 192 FTE
STATE-SIZE 8444 FT MYERS EAST 192 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2807-1506 192 FTE
CITY-NEAR Diversified Maintenance Systems LLC 10,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tampa General Hospital 7,849 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valet Living, LLC 6,337 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST. Joseph's Hospital (5100) 5,540 FTE
NAT-TCR Worthington High School 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Ptcr Lithia Springs 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Jesup 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Highland Meadow Nursery 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pioneer Pole Buildings 192 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ernie Ball Inc. 192 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dakota City Hides 192 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Richland School District Two 192 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.