Fabricated pipe and pipe fittings made from purchased pipe · Wisconsin

Piping Systems, Inc.

Hortonville, WI · ~77 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Piping Systems, Inc. runs at 227% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fabricated pipe and pipe fittings made from purchased pipe workplace, earning a grade F.

Piping Systems, Inc.: 7.5 TCR = 227% of Fabricated pipe and pipe fittings made from purchased pipe BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Piping Systems, Inc. safety composite

Piping Systems, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Piping Systems, Inc.: 4.1 → 7.3 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 15.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.14× in 2024

Piping Systems, Inc.'s TCR rose 3.3 from 4.1 in 2017 to 7.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 15.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332996 · Hortonville, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.5 · 227% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #15/20
  • PHOTO Precision Tube Inc
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 43 inj
  • SIZE ~77 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Precision Tube Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Piping Systems, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Piping Systems, Inc. averages 7.5 TCR (227% of the Fabricated pipe and pipe fittings made from purchased pipe BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Piping Systems, Inc. TCR series: 2017=4.1 · 2018=5.6 · 2019=11.4 · 2020=7.3 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=15.3 · 2024=7.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Piping Systems, Inc. falls in its industry

337 Fabricated pipe and pipe fitti establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 20 Fabricated pipe and pipe fitti employers in Wisconsin.

Piping Systems, Inc. (77 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Piping Systems, Inc.
Piping Systems, Inc. (77 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Piping Systems, Inc. has more employees than the Fabricated pipe and pipe fittings made f median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.3 1.1 7 0 0
2023 15.3 6.1 10 0 0
2022 3.3 0.0 2 0 0
2021 5.5 3.6 3 0 0
2020 7.3 1.2 6 0 0
2019 11.4 2.9 7 1 0
2018 5.6 1.1 5 0 0
2017 4.1 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332996 · WI · Hortonville

337 Fabricated pipe and pipe fittings made from purchased pipe employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 9 employers in Hortonville, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Precision Tube Inc 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Appian Manufacturing Corp 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Master Manufacturing Group 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pinnacle Machine - 15201 Sheldon 7.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE SWLP USC 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Joe Daniels Construction Co., Inc. 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pember Companies, Inc. 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE US201: Milwaukee 336 - SG 77 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gardan - Hortonville 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR SCP Inc 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR Global Fab Inc. 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR TOM-CIN METALS INC 46 FTE
NAT-TCR Ken Garner Manufacturing 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Rouses Market #17 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Timothy & Viguie C.S.V. 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Con-Tech Manufacturing, Inc. Dodge Center 7.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Innovative Produce, LP 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE S02969 - El Sobrante Landfill 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE S08486 - NW Regional MRF 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE NOVA Fire Protection, Inc. 77 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.