Tomato farming (except under cover), field, bedding plant and seed production · California

Timothy & Viguie C.S.V.

Dixon, CA · ~47 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Timothy & Viguie C.S.V. runs at 166% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Tomato farming (except under cover), field, bedding plant and seed production workplace, earning a grade D.

Timothy & Viguie C.S.V.: 7.5 TCR = 166% of Tomato farming (except under cover), field, bedding plant and seed production BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Timothy & Viguie C.S.V. safety composite

Timothy & Viguie C.S.V. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2017→2024

Timothy & Viguie C.S.V. injury rate improved

Timothy & Viguie C.S.V.'s TCR fell 3.2 from 8.6 in 2017 to 5.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 12.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.6 · 2018=9.7 · 2019=9.4 · 2020=4.4 · 2022=12.4 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=5.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 111219 · Dixon, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.5 · 166% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #122/175
  • PHOTO Costa Farms, Inc.
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Costa Farms, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Timothy & Viguie C.S.V. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Timothy & Viguie C.S.V. averages 7.5 TCR (166% of the Tomato farming (except under cover), field, bedding plant and seed production BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Timothy & Viguie C.S.V. TCR series: 2017=8.6 · 2018=9.7 · 2019=9.4 · 2020=4.4 · 2022=12.4 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=5.4 · BLS 4.5

Where Timothy & Viguie C.S.V. falls in its industry

331 Tomato farming (except under c establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #122 safest of 175 Tomato farming (except under c employers in California.

Timothy & Viguie C.S.V. (47 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Timothy & Viguie C.S.V.
Timothy & Viguie C.S.V. (47 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.5

Timothy & Viguie C.S.V. has fewer employees than the Tomato farming (except under cover), fie median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.4 0.0 2 0 0
2023 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2022 12.4 9.3 4 0 0
2020 4.4 4.4 2 0 0
2019 9.4 0.0 3 0 0
2018 9.7 9.7 4 0 0
2017 8.6 2.9 1 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

111219 · CA · Dixon

331 Tomato farming (except under cover), field, bedding plant and seed production employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 64 employers in Dixon, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Costa Farms, Inc. 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Costa Farms 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR TELESIS ONION CO., INC. 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kelena Farms, Inc. 7.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bowles Farming Company,Inc. 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ruiz Farm Labor 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fresh Valley Harvesting, LLC. 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yount Mill Vineyards 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 174 2,579 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayoral Brothers Incoporated Farm Labor Contractor 375 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5139 316 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5139 300 FTE
NAT-TCR Con-Tech Manufacturing, Inc. Dodge Center 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Ken Garner Manufacturing 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Davis Stuart, Inc 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Piping Systems, Inc. 7.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE High School 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Silver Maple Construction, LLC 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Serco - Austin,TX 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE TMR Okeechobee 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.