Fasteners (e.g., bolts, nuts, rivets, screws) merchant wholesalers · Pennsylvania

Pittsburgh Branch

Pittsburgh, PA · ~42 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pittsburgh Branch runs at 133% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Fasteners (e.g., bolts, nuts, rivets, screws) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade D.

Pittsburgh Branch: 2.9 TCR = 133% of Fasteners (e.g., bolts, nuts, rivets, screws) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pittsburgh Branch safety composite

Pittsburgh Branch scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2016→2024

Pittsburgh Branch injury rate improved

Pittsburgh Branch's TCR fell 2.2 from 2.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 7.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.2 · 2017=2.9 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=7.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423710 · Pittsburgh, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 2.9 · 133% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/18
  • PHOTO Trinity Logistics Co…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Trinity Logistics Corporation - MDC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Pittsburgh Branch in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pittsburgh Branch averages 2.9 TCR (133% of the Fasteners (e.g., bolts, nuts, rivets, screws) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pittsburgh Branch TCR series: 2016=2.2 · 2017=2.9 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=7.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Pittsburgh Branch falls in its industry

449 Fasteners (e.g., bolts, nuts, establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 18 Fasteners (e.g., bolts, nuts, employers in Pennsylvania.

Pittsburgh Branch (42 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Pittsburgh Branch
Pittsburgh Branch (42 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Pittsburgh Branch has fewer employees than the Fasteners (e.g., bolts, nuts, rivets, sc median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 7.3 7.3 3 0 0
2019 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2018 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2017 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2016 2.2 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423710 · PA · Pittsburgh

449 Fasteners (e.g., bolts, nuts, rivets, screws) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Trinity Logistics Corporation - MDC 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fort Madison, IA 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR KR Johnson 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Capitol Hardware Company, Inc. 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Needhams Mushroom Farm 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE KSS Sales 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hy-Tech Mushroom Compost, Inc. 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hopewell Organics, LLC 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR SIMONA Boltaron Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Bingman's Painting Service, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR BEF Lima 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR SEFA Group (SIS) 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE JXN 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Building Management Partners 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE High Tech Machine 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Morelli Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc. 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.