Coiled springs (except clock, watch), light gauge, made from purchased wire or strip, manufacturing · Michigan

P.J. Wallbank Springs, Inc

Port Huron, MI · ~138 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

P.J. Wallbank Springs, Inc runs at 172% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Coiled springs (except clock, watch), light gauge, made from purchased wire or strip, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

P.J. Wallbank Springs, Inc: 5.7 TCR = 172% of Coiled springs (except clock, watch), light gauge, made from purchased wire or strip, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

P.J. Wallbank Springs, Inc safety composite

P.J. Wallbank Springs, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

P.J. Wallbank Springs, Inc: 4.6 → 6.7 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 6.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.66× in 2020

P.J. Wallbank Springs, Inc's TCR rose 2.1 from 4.6 in 2018 to 6.7 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332613 · Port Huron, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.7 · 172% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK #13/16
  • PHOTO PLYMOUTH SPRING COMP…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~138 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PLYMOUTH SPRING COMPANY (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

P.J. Wallbank Springs, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows P.J. Wallbank Springs, Inc averages 5.7 TCR (172% of the Coiled springs (except clock, watch), light gauge, made from purchased wire or strip, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

P.J. Wallbank Springs, Inc TCR series: 2018=4.6 · 2020=6.7 · BLS 3.3

Where P.J. Wallbank Springs, Inc falls in its industry

189 Coiled springs (except clock, establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 16 Coiled springs (except clock, employers in Michigan.

P.J. Wallbank Springs, Inc (138 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate P.J. Wallbank Springs, Inc
P.J. Wallbank Springs, Inc (138 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 4.4

P.J. Wallbank Springs, Inc has more employees than the Coiled springs (except clock, watch), li median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 6.7 3.7 9 0 0
2018 4.6 2.6 6 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332613 · MI · Port Huron

189 Coiled springs (except clock, watch), light gauge, made from purchased wire or strip, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 87 employers in Port Huron, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PLYMOUTH SPRING COMPANY 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Century Spring Corporation 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR US Chita Co Ltd 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maryland Precision Spring 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Great Lakes Water Authority - Central Services Facility 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE DVM Utilities, Inc. 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE Butcher and Butcher Construction 138 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3211 Battle Creek Mill 138 FTE
CITY-NEAR MCLAREN PORT HURON 1,384 FTE
CITY-NEAR McLaren Port Huron Hospital 1,333 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of St. Clair 861 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lake Huron Medical Center 688 FTE
NAT-TCR Maintenance Shop 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon Transportation Services : MDW5 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : FTW1 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Logan Enterprises of Cary, Inc. 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brewerton NY 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pearland Medical Center 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE General Beverage Sales Co.-Milwaukee 138 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ridgid Products 138 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.