Springs, precision (except clock, watch), light gauge, made from purchased wire or strip · Connecticut

Plymouth Spring Company

Bristol, CT · ~50 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Plymouth Spring Company runs at 172% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Springs, precision (except clock, watch), light gauge, made from purchased wire or strip workplace, earning a grade D.

Plymouth Spring Company: 5.7 TCR = 172% of Springs, precision (except clock, watch), light gauge, made from purchased wire or strip BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Plymouth Spring Company safety composite

Plymouth Spring Company scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Plymouth Spring Company: 2.1 → 9.7 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 10.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.71× in 2024

Plymouth Spring Company's TCR rose 7.6 from 2.1 in 2017 to 9.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 10.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332613 · Bristol, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.7 · 172% of ind

  • DART 9.7 DART
  • RANK #9/12
  • PHOTO P.J. Wallbank Spring…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: P.J. Wallbank Springs, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Plymouth Spring Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Plymouth Spring Company averages 5.7 TCR (172% of the Springs, precision (except clock, watch), light gauge, made from purchased wire or strip BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Plymouth Spring Company TCR series: 2017=2.1 · 2018=2 · 2019=3.7 · 2020=5.8 · 2021=5.7 · 2022=5.8 · 2023=10.6 · 2024=9.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Plymouth Spring Company falls in its industry

189 Springs, precision (except clo establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 12 Springs, precision (except clo employers in Connecticut.

Plymouth Spring Company (50 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Plymouth Spring Company
Plymouth Spring Company (50 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Plymouth Spring Company has fewer employees than the Springs, precision (except clock, watch) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.7 9.7 3 0 0
2023 10.6 6.4 3 2 0
2022 5.8 0.0 1 2 0
2021 5.7 3.8 2 1 0
2020 5.8 1.9 3 0 0
2019 3.7 1.9 2 0 0
2018 2.0 0.0 1 0 0
2017 2.1 0.0 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332613 · CT · Bristol

189 Springs, precision (except clock, watch), light gauge, made from purchased wire or strip employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 95 employers in Bristol, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR P.J. Wallbank Springs, Inc 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Century Spring Corporation 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR US Chita Co Ltd 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maryland Precision Spring 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE LeafGuard of Connecticut 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eagle Fence and Guardrail 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE CT32 AMETEK SMP WALLINGFORD 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Advanced Performance Glass, Inc. 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR ESPN Bristol Campus 3,688 FTE
CITY-NEAR ESPN Headquarters 3,607 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bristol Public Schoold 1,432 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bristol Hospital 1,370 FTE
NAT-TCR Jessica Charles 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR JOVE Laboratories, LLC. 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 992 Moreno Valley DC 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Hca Florida Bayonet Point Hospital 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE H&H Painting Co. 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE National Metal Stampings Inc. 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Industrial Construction Specialists, LLC 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Detwiler Roofing LLC 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.