Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant · North Dakota

PKG Contracting, Inc, - Minot NAWS WTF

Minot, ND · ~21 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

PKG Contracting, Inc, - Minot NAWS WTF runs at 223% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant workplace, earning a grade F.

PKG Contracting, Inc, - Minot NAWS WTF: 6.3 TCR = 223% of Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

PKG Contracting, Inc, - Minot NAWS WTF safety composite

PKG Contracting, Inc, - Minot NAWS WTF scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.5

2019→2020

PKG Contracting, Inc, - Minot NAWS WTF injury rate improved

PKG Contracting, Inc, - Minot NAWS WTF's TCR fell 12.5 from 12.5 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 12.5 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=12.5 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Minot, ND ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.3 · 223% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/8
  • PHOTO Minger Construction …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Minger Construction Companies Incorporated (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Dakota employers → · Look up another →

PKG Contracting, Inc, - Minot NAWS WTF in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows PKG Contracting, Inc, - Minot NAWS WTF averages 6.3 TCR (223% of the Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

PKG Contracting, Inc, - Minot NAWS WTF TCR series: 2019=12.5 · 2020=0 · BLS 2.8

Where PKG Contracting, Inc, - Minot NAWS WTF falls in its industry

1,614 Construction management, water establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Dakota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 8 Construction management, water employers in North Dakota.

PKG Contracting, Inc, - Minot NAWS WTF (21 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate PKG Contracting, Inc, - Minot NAWS WTF
PKG Contracting, Inc, - Minot NAWS WTF (21 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

PKG Contracting, Inc, - Minot NAWS WTF has fewer employees than the Construction management, water and sewag median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 12.5 8.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · ND · Minot

1,614 Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,696 rated employers in North Dakota with headcount on file · 96 employers in Minot, ND · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Minger Construction Companies Incorporated 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Office - 01 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cardinal Civil Contracting, LLC 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vanderpool Construction 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dawson Farms 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Charlson Field 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE LDI Energy Services LLC 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Keene FST (KNEWD) 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dakota Boys and Girls Ranch 500 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1636 445 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1636 404 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kalix 355 FTE
NAT-TCR Mercy Health Humility House 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Kettering Medical Center 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Penobscot Bay Medical Center 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Accurate Mold & Plastic 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fairfield Inn Burlington Williston 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arrow Exterminators Midtown HSC 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arrow Exterminators Raleigh 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stark Exterminators Gulfport 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.