Private warehousing and storage, general merchandise · South Carolina

PL Developments - Clinton Warehouse

Clinton, SC · ~33 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

PL Developments - Clinton Warehouse runs at 46% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Private warehousing and storage, general merchandise workplace, earning a grade A.

PL Developments - Clinton Warehouse: 2.7 TCR = 46% of Private warehousing and storage, general merchandise BLS 5.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

PL Developments - Clinton Warehouse safety composite

PL Developments - Clinton Warehouse scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

PL Developments - Clinton Warehouse held a steady TCR band

PL Developments - Clinton Warehouse's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 8.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=0.0 · 2023=8.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Clinton, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.7 · 46% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #72/160
  • PHOTO Panacea Products - V…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Panacea Products - Venture Court (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

PL Developments - Clinton Warehouse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows PL Developments - Clinton Warehouse averages 2.7 TCR (46% of the Private warehousing and storage, general merchandise BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

PL Developments - Clinton Warehouse TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=8 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.8

Where PL Developments - Clinton Warehouse falls in its industry

9,477 Private warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #72 safest of 160 Private warehousing and storag employers in South Carolina.

PL Developments - Clinton Warehouse (33 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate PL Developments - Clinton Warehouse
PL Developments - Clinton Warehouse (33 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

PL Developments - Clinton Warehouse has fewer employees than the Private warehousing and storage, general median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 8.0 8.0 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · SC · Clinton

9,477 Private warehousing and storage, general merchandise employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 27 employers in Clinton, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Panacea Products - Venture Court 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CA SALES CENTER 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR ONW Olive Branch 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR WM 7520 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE BEC- Johns Island Facility 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE MYRTLE BEACH DISTRICT OFFICE 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Anderson Resource Center PNG 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hogan Construction - Greenville 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sterilite Corporation CSC 609 FTE
CITY-NEAR LAURENS COUNTY MEDICAL CAMPUS 392 FTE
CITY-NEAR PL Developments - Clinton plant 211 FTE
CITY-NEAR astenjohnson clinton 205 FTE
NAT-TCR Materion - Albuquerque (North) 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR The Trade Milwaukee 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Neighborly Pest Management - Roseville 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR McElhaney Feedyard 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Postle Industries Inc. 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Western Specialty Contractors - Chicago 109 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Suderman Contracting Stevedores (Houston) dba Metro Ports 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stephenson Equipment Inc - Butler 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.