Annealing metals and metal products for the trade · Ohio

P&L Heat Treating and Grinding, Inc

Youngstown, Oh, OH · ~23 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

P&L Heat Treating and Grinding, Inc runs at 276% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Annealing metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade F.

P&L Heat Treating and Grinding, Inc: 9.1 TCR = 276% of Annealing metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

P&L Heat Treating and Grinding, Inc safety composite

P&L Heat Treating and Grinding, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2023→2024

P&L Heat Treating and Grinding, Inc injury rate improved

P&L Heat Treating and Grinding, Inc's TCR fell 0.4 from 9.3 in 2023 to 8.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 9.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.98× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=9.3 · 2024=8.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332811 · Youngstown, Oh, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.1 · 276% of ind

  • DART 8.9 DART
  • RANK #32/34
  • PHOTO Amac Enterprises, Inc.
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Amac Enterprises, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

P&L Heat Treating and Grinding, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows P&L Heat Treating and Grinding, Inc averages 9.1 TCR (276% of the Annealing metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

P&L Heat Treating and Grinding, Inc TCR series: 2023=9.3 · 2024=8.9 · BLS 3.3

Where P&L Heat Treating and Grinding, Inc falls in its industry

248 Annealing metals and metal pro establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 34 Annealing metals and metal pro employers in Ohio.

P&L Heat Treating and Grinding, Inc (23 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate P&L Heat Treating and Grinding, Inc
P&L Heat Treating and Grinding, Inc (23 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2

P&L Heat Treating and Grinding, Inc has fewer employees than the Annealing metals and metal products for median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.9 8.9 2 0 0
2023 9.3 4.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332811 · OH · Youngstown, Oh

248 Annealing metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Amac Enterprises, Inc. 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Technical Metal Finishing 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR United County Industries Corporation 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR AP Westshore, Inc 9.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE MID EAST PRODUCTION LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schlessman Seed Co 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lake County Nursery 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE LCN Holdings Inc dba Lake County Nursery 23 FTE
NAT-TCR Orthman Conveying Systems 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR The Right Step Houston 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Mendota 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Capital Construction Services 9.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Marquiss Electric, Inc. 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Runge Painting Company, Inc. 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gaalswyk Brothers Trucking, Inc 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Staypineapple, Midtown New York 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.