Shot peening metal and metal products for the trade · Connecticut

Technical Metal Finishing

Wallingford, CT · ~28 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Technical Metal Finishing runs at 275% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Shot peening metal and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade F.

Technical Metal Finishing: 9.1 TCR = 275% of Shot peening metal and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Technical Metal Finishing safety composite

Technical Metal Finishing scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Technical Metal Finishing: 0.0 → 12.5 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 17.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.38× in 2020

Technical Metal Finishing's TCR rose 12.5 from 0.0 in 2017 to 12.5 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 17.1 TCR. In 2020, DART was 1.38× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332811 · Wallingford, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.1 · 275% of ind

  • DART 12.5 DART
  • RANK #8/11
  • PHOTO Amac Enterprises, Inc.
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Amac Enterprises, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Technical Metal Finishing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Technical Metal Finishing averages 9.1 TCR (275% of the Shot peening metal and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Technical Metal Finishing TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=6.8 · 2019=17.1 · 2020=12.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Technical Metal Finishing falls in its industry

248 Shot peening metal and metal p establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 11 Shot peening metal and metal p employers in Connecticut.

Technical Metal Finishing (28 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Technical Metal Finishing
Technical Metal Finishing (28 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Technical Metal Finishing has fewer employees than the Shot peening metal and metal products fo median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 12.5 12.5 3 0 0
2019 17.1 10.2 5 0 0
2018 6.8 6.8 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332811 · CT · Wallingford

248 Shot peening metal and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 136 employers in Wallingford, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Amac Enterprises, Inc. 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR P&L Heat Treating and Grinding, Inc 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR United County Industries Corporation 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR AP Westshore, Inc 9.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE New Haven Harbor Station 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lake Road Generating Company LLC 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Connecticut Municipal Electric Energy Cooperative 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE New York Division 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon Transportation Services : BDL5 1,386 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gaylord Hopital 986 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BDL5 956 FTE
CITY-NEAR DDS South Region 606 FTE
NAT-TCR Eastern Propane & Oil 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Ross store 275 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : BWI4 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sun Pacific Farming | Grape Harvesting & Farming | QC 9.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE 15 Floyd 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE MacKinnon Jacksonville 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Schenker Inc(Intel Santa Clara) 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hampton Inn Hanover 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.