Private warehousing and storage except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated · California

Plant 32

Cypress, CA · ~169 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Plant 32 runs at 70% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Private warehousing and storage except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated workplace, earning a grade B.

Plant 32: 4.1 TCR = 70% of Private warehousing and storage except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated BLS 5.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Plant 32 safety composite

Plant 32 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Plant 32: 2.0 → 4.3 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 5.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.87× in 2024

Plant 32's TCR rose 2.2 from 2.0 in 2016 to 4.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493190 · Cypress, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 4.1 · 70% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #31/49
  • PHOTO AWC Portland
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 64 inj
  • SIZE ~169 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AWC Portland (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Plant 32 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Plant 32 averages 4.1 TCR (70% of the Private warehousing and storage except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Plant 32 TCR series: 2016=2 · 2017=5.4 · 2018=5.8 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=3.2 · 2021=5.6 · 2022=5 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=4.3 · BLS 5.8

Where Plant 32 falls in its industry

453 Private warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 49 Private warehousing and storag employers in California.

Plant 32 (169 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Plant 32
Plant 32 (169 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Plant 32 has more employees than the Private warehousing and storage except f median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.3 3.5 6 0 0
2023 3.1 3.1 5 0 0
2022 5.0 4.4 9 0 0
2021 5.6 5.6 9 3 0
2020 3.2 3.2 6 0 0
2019 2.2 2.2 5 0 0
2018 5.8 5.4 13 0 0
2017 5.4 4.1 8 0 0
2016 2.0 1.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493190 · CA · Cypress

453 Private warehousing and storage except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 65 employers in Cypress, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AWC Portland 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lowell International Co. 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Torrance B112 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wesco - Haas Group International Atlanta Distribution Center 4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Adam Gutierrez 169 FTE
STATE-SIZE E & C LABOR SERVICES INC 169 FTE
STATE-SIZE MALAGA SHIPPING 169 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cal-South Harvesting, Inc. 169 FTE
CITY-NEAR B2B Staffing Services Inc 433 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yamaha Motor Corporation, USA - Cypress 365 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0748 - CYPRESS CA WHSE 363 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles CA Branch 342 FTE
NAT-TCR East Neck Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Cresline-West, Inc. 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Oaks Precision Fabricating, Inc. 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Western Transport, Inc. 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Texas Concrete Partners (Elm Mott) 169 FTE
NAT-SIZE Detroit 169 FTE
NAT-SIZE WILLIAMSBURG 169 FTE
NAT-SIZE RHP MECHANICAL SYSTEMS, INC dba; RAY HEATING PRODUCTS INC. 169 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.