Prestressed concrete products (except blocks, bricks, pipes) manufacturing · Texas

Texas Concrete Partners (Elm Mott)

Elm Mott, TX · ~169 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Texas Concrete Partners (Elm Mott) runs at 49% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Prestressed concrete products (except blocks, bricks, pipes) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Texas Concrete Partners (Elm Mott): 1.6 TCR = 49% of Prestressed concrete products (except blocks, bricks, pipes) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Texas Concrete Partners (Elm Mott) safety composite

Texas Concrete Partners (Elm Mott) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2016→2024

Texas Concrete Partners (Elm Mott) injury rate improved

Texas Concrete Partners (Elm Mott)'s TCR fell 2.1 from 2.6 in 2016 to 0.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.6 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=1.0 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=0.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327390 · Elm Mott, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 49% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #22/79
  • PHOTO Dukane Precast - Nap…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~169 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dukane Precast - Naperville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Texas Concrete Partners (Elm Mott) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Texas Concrete Partners (Elm Mott) averages 1.6 TCR (49% of the Prestressed concrete products (except blocks, bricks, pipes) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Texas Concrete Partners (Elm Mott) TCR series: 2016=2.6 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=1 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=0.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Texas Concrete Partners (Elm Mott) falls in its industry

790 Prestressed concrete products establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 79 Prestressed concrete products employers in Texas.

Texas Concrete Partners (Elm Mott) (169 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Texas Concrete Partners (Elm Mott)
Texas Concrete Partners (Elm Mott) (169 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Texas Concrete Partners (Elm Mott) has more employees than the Prestressed concrete products (except bl median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2023 1.8 1.4 4 0 0
2022 1.0 1.0 2 0 0
2021 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2020 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2019 2.1 2.1 4 0 0
2018 3.1 3.1 6 0 0
2017 2.4 1.0 5 0 0
2016 2.6 2.1 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327390 · TX · Elm Mott

790 Prestressed concrete products (except blocks, bricks, pipes) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dukane Precast - Naperville 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Artisan Stone Company, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oldcastle OPI - Lakeside 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arnold Wilbert Corp - Goldsboro, NC 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE PYCO Industries Inc. 169 FTE
STATE-SIZE schoenmann produce company 169 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rumsey Construction Inc. 169 FTE
STATE-SIZE Reynolds asphalt and Construction Company 169 FTE
NAT-TCR Carson Helicopters, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR HC Constructors Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR The Waldinger Corporation 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Homewood Holyoke 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Plant 32 169 FTE
NAT-SIZE WILLIAMSBURG 169 FTE
NAT-SIZE Detroit 169 FTE
NAT-SIZE RHP MECHANICAL SYSTEMS, INC dba; RAY HEATING PRODUCTS INC. 169 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.