Private warehousing and storage except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated · Michigan

Plant DF

Belleville, MI · ~24 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Plant DF runs at 57% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Private warehousing and storage except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated workplace, earning a grade B.

Plant DF: 3.3 TCR = 57% of Private warehousing and storage except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated BLS 5.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Plant DF safety composite

Plant DF scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.2

2016→2024

Plant DF injury rate improved

Plant DF's TCR fell 4.2 from 4.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 10.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.2 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=8.1 · 2021=10.0 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493190 · Belleville, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.3 · 57% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/16
  • PHOTO YRMC Materials Manag…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: YRMC Materials Management (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Plant DF in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Plant DF averages 3.3 TCR (57% of the Private warehousing and storage except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Plant DF TCR series: 2016=4.2 · 2017=0 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=0 · 2020=8.1 · 2021=10 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Plant DF falls in its industry

453 Private warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 16 Private warehousing and storag employers in Michigan.

Plant DF (24 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Plant DF
Plant DF (24 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Plant DF has fewer employees than the Private warehousing and storage except f median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2021 10.0 10.0 3 0 0
2020 8.1 8.1 1 1 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.2 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.2 4.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493190 · MI · Belleville

453 Private warehousing and storage except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 70 employers in Belleville, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR YRMC Materials Management 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plant SR 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR OBE-SC06-CRL-SECAUCUS 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR OH. Cincinnati - 139AA 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Medina Dairy, LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sturgis 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE CE Innovation Center 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Water Filtration and Meter Shop 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR NEAPCO Drivelines 640 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5481 361 FTE
CITY-NEAR LW Engineering Plant 2 332 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2872 300 FTE
NAT-TCR 32 South Main Street, Suite 1, Norwood, NY 13668 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Supply Chain : Roper Corporation, Lafayette, GA 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Pettipaug 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant Eagle #0004 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wilmington Iron & Metal Co., Inc. 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Port of Albany Distribution Center 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wesley Chapel Store - # 216 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Abbington of Powell 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.