Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Ohio

Abbington of Powell

Powell, OH · ~24 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Abbington of Powell runs at 167% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Abbington of Powell: 6.4 TCR = 167% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Abbington of Powell safety composite

Abbington of Powell scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Abbington of Powell held a steady TCR band

Abbington of Powell's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 23.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=11.8 · 2018=23.8 · 2019=11.2 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=5.5 · 2023=5.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Powell, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.4 · 167% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #137/243
  • PHOTO HallKeen Assisted Li…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HallKeen Assisted Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Abbington of Powell in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Abbington of Powell averages 6.4 TCR (167% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Abbington of Powell TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=11.8 · 2018=23.8 · 2019=11.2 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=5.5 · 2023=5 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Abbington of Powell falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #137 safest of 243 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Ohio.

Abbington of Powell (24 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Abbington of Powell
Abbington of Powell (24 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Abbington of Powell has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 5.0 5.0 1 0 0
2022 5.5 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 11.2 5.6 2 0 0
2018 23.8 5.9 4 0 0
2017 11.8 0.0 1 1 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · OH · Powell

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 21 employers in Powell, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HallKeen Assisted Living 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Worthington Manor 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Asheville Walden Ridge 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Solstice Senior Living at El Cajon 6.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE LCN 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE NAES: Fremont 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMP Fremont Energy Center 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bucyrus Service Center 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR LeaderStat 504 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2851 - Powell 194 FTE
CITY-NEAR Giant Eagle #6527 193 FTE
CITY-NEAR Liberty Township/Powell YMCA 188 FTE
NAT-TCR IKEA Tacoma DC 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Browns of Bellport 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Dothan - 28 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Southwest Steel Processing 6.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wesley Chapel Store - # 216 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Port of Albany Distribution Center 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE ACT Pipe & Supply, Inc. (Dallas) 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plant DF 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.