Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade · Michigan

Plating Division

Detroit, MI · ~80 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Plating Division runs at 63% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade workplace, earning a grade B.

Plating Division: 2.1 TCR = 63% of Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Plating Division safety composite

Plating Division scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2017→2024

Plating Division injury rate improved

Plating Division's TCR fell 0.9 from 2.1 in 2017 to 1.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.1 · 2018=4.9 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332813 · Detroit, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 63% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #10/48
  • PHOTO Oberg Medical Finish…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~80 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Oberg Medical Finishing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Plating Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Plating Division averages 2.1 TCR (63% of the Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Plating Division TCR series: 2017=2.1 · 2018=4.9 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Plating Division falls in its industry

585 Electroplating metals and form establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 48 Electroplating metals and form employers in Michigan.

Plating Division (80 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Plating Division
Plating Division (80 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Plating Division has more employees than the Electroplating metals and formed product median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.2 0.0 0 1 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.4 2.4 2 0 0
2020 3.5 1.2 3 0 0
2019 2.5 0.0 3 0 0
2018 4.9 0.0 5 1 0
2017 2.1 2.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332813 · MI · Detroit

585 Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 673 employers in Detroit, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Oberg Medical Finishing 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Power Services : Houston, TX, USA (Amstar) 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Craftsman Plating & Tinning 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Astro Pak Corporation - Downey 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Country Dairy, Inc. 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Area Energy Center 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Howell SC 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE AL'S ASPHALT PAVING CO 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henry Ford Hospital 8,838 FTE
CITY-NEAR Detroit Campus 8,632 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - DTW 6,640 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Motors Corporation 5,241 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at San Antonio Laundry 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR MCC 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Davis Development Inc 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR US Gypsum Port Reading 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE E A Sween Company-Lewisville 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE S03457 - Columbus Hauling 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oakmont of Carmichael 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Davidson Water, Inc. 80 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.