Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Oakmont of Carmichael

Carmichael, CA · ~80 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oakmont of Carmichael runs at 251% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Oakmont of Carmichael: 9.5 TCR = 251% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oakmont of Carmichael safety composite

Oakmont of Carmichael scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.7

2017→2024

Oakmont of Carmichael injury rate improved

Oakmont of Carmichael's TCR fell 5.7 from 17.8 in 2017 to 12.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 18.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=17.8 · 2018=14.0 · 2019=18.1 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=12.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Carmichael, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.5 · 251% of ind

  • DART 6.1 DART
  • RANK #333/635
  • PHOTO Villas of Holly Broo…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~80 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Villas of Holly Brook - Bloomington Towanda (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Oakmont of Carmichael in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oakmont of Carmichael averages 9.5 TCR (251% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oakmont of Carmichael TCR series: 2017=17.8 · 2018=14 · 2019=18.1 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=12.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Oakmont of Carmichael falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #333 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Oakmont of Carmichael (80 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Oakmont of Carmichael
Oakmont of Carmichael (80 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Oakmont of Carmichael has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.1 6.1 8 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2021 3.1 3.1 2 0 0
2019 18.1 12.1 10 2 0
2018 14.0 9.4 5 4 0
2017 17.8 4.9 3 8 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Carmichael

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 48 employers in Carmichael, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Villas of Holly Brook - Bloomington Towanda 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Home Sweet Home on the Hudson 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Park Gardens Senior Living 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-63122 9.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE JJJ HARVESTING 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE T&A - Huron - Farm 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pacifc International Marketing 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wilgenburg Greenhouses 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR San Juan Unified School District 6,739 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030163 2,683 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy San Juan Medical Center 2,421 FTE
CITY-NEAR 06-155997292-3 2,401 FTE
NAT-TCR S R Mechanical, Inc 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Auburn Facility 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Green Forest Par-Fry Plant 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Morton Grove Fire Department 9.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE City of Royal Oak - Department of Public Works 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jackson Public Schools 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brinleys Grading Service Inc 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Keefe Group Maryland 80 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.