Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innerspring, noninnerspring) manufacturing · California

Pleasant Mattress Inc.

Fresno, CA · ~131 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pleasant Mattress Inc. runs at 226% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innerspring, noninnerspring) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Pleasant Mattress Inc.: 7.5 TCR = 226% of Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innerspring, noninnerspring) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pleasant Mattress Inc. safety composite

Pleasant Mattress Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pleasant Mattress Inc.: 0.0 → 12.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 12.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.58× in 2024

Pleasant Mattress Inc.'s TCR rose 12.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 12.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 337910 · Fresno, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.5 · 226% of ind

  • DART 4.3 DART
  • RANK #7/9
  • PHOTO Therapedic of New En…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 91 inj
  • SIZE ~131 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Therapedic of New England - Brockton (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Pleasant Mattress Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pleasant Mattress Inc. averages 7.5 TCR (226% of the Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innerspring, noninnerspring) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pleasant Mattress Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=8.6 · 2018=11 · 2019=9.3 · 2020=11.6 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=4.6 · 2023=5.3 · 2024=12 · BLS 3.3

Where Pleasant Mattress Inc. falls in its industry

160 Mattresses (i.e., box spring, establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 9 Mattresses (i.e., box spring, employers in California.

Pleasant Mattress Inc. (131 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Pleasant Mattress Inc.
Pleasant Mattress Inc. (131 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Pleasant Mattress Inc. has more employees than the Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innersprin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.0 4.3 11 0 0
2023 5.3 0.9 6 0 0
2022 4.6 3.8 6 0 0
2021 4.8 2.7 7 0 0
2020 11.6 10.2 17 0 0
2019 9.3 8.1 15 0 0
2018 11.0 9.6 16 0 0
2017 8.6 8.0 13 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

337910 · CA · Fresno

160 Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innerspring, noninnerspring) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 981 employers in Fresno, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Therapedic of New England - Brockton 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Original Mattress Factory - Cincinnati 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1055 S Jason St 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sleep International LLC 7.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Babe Blosser Ranch 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dave Wilson Nursery 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gold Flora Corp 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE Land FLC 131 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Fresno 7,553 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ag Force LLC 6,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Regional Medical Ctr 5,549 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Regional Medical Center 4,921 FTE
NAT-TCR Maris Grove 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Stevens Elementary School 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Gregory Industries dba Gregory Roll Forming 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Metamora Industries 7.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gunter Construction Company, Inc.- Lawrenceville 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE Juliette Fowler Communities 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE LandWorks Sussex 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hiland Wood Products Inc. 131 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.