Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innerspring, noninnerspring) manufacturing · Massachusetts

Therapedic of New England - Brockton

Brockton, MA · ~62 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Therapedic of New England - Brockton runs at 223% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innerspring, noninnerspring) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Therapedic of New England - Brockton: 7.4 TCR = 223% of Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innerspring, noninnerspring) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Therapedic of New England - Brockton safety composite

Therapedic of New England - Brockton scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Therapedic of New England - Brockton: 5.1 → 10.8 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 11.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.17× in 2024

Therapedic of New England - Brockton's TCR rose 5.6 from 5.1 in 2016 to 10.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 11.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 337910 · Brockton, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.4 · 223% of ind

  • DART 8.6 DART
  • RANK P20
  • PHOTO Pleasant Mattress Inc.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 39 inj
  • SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pleasant Mattress Inc. (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Therapedic of New England - Brockton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Therapedic of New England - Brockton averages 7.4 TCR (223% of the Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innerspring, noninnerspring) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Therapedic of New England - Brockton TCR series: 2016=5.1 · 2017=11 · 2018=8.6 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=10.6 · 2021=8.6 · 2022=3.7 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=10.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Therapedic of New England - Brockton falls in its industry

160 Mattresses (i.e., box spring, establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Therapedic of New England - Brockton (62 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Therapedic of New England - Brockton
Therapedic of New England - Brockton (62 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Therapedic of New England - Brockton has fewer employees than the Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innersprin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.8 8.6 5 0 0
2023 4.1 2.1 2 0 0
2022 3.7 3.7 2 0 0
2021 8.6 8.6 5 0 0
2020 10.6 10.6 5 0 0
2019 3.6 1.8 2 0 0
2018 8.6 6.9 5 0 0
2017 11.0 7.3 9 0 0
2016 5.1 5.1 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

337910 · MA · Brockton

160 Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innerspring, noninnerspring) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 111 employers in Brockton, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pleasant Mattress Inc. 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1055 S Jason St 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Original Mattress Factory - Cincinnati 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sleep International LLC 7.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Middleborough Gas & Electric Department Electric Division 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE WYMAN ST WALTHAM-MAAL 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Middleborough Gas & Electric Department Gas Division 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eversource - Worcester 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR BROCKTON HOSPITAL 1,872 FTE
CITY-NEAR GOOD SAMARITAN MEDICAL CENTER 1,595 FTE
CITY-NEAR BAMSI 1,393 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brockton Neighborhood Health Center 639 FTE
NAT-TCR Architectural Polymers 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Barro's Pizza, 67th Ave 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR DRM Industries Corp 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Morgantown, PA 7.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Beverly Hills #513 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rescar Corporate 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Pediatric Group - Lake Ridge 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Braskem Oyster Creek Facility 62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.