Continuing care retirement communities · Illinois

Pleasant View Lutheran Home

Ottawa, IL · ~142 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pleasant View Lutheran Home runs at 218% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade F.

Pleasant View Lutheran Home: 8.3 TCR = 218% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pleasant View Lutheran Home safety composite

Pleasant View Lutheran Home scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2016→2023

Pleasant View Lutheran Home injury rate improved

Pleasant View Lutheran Home's TCR fell 1.7 from 4.3 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 37.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.3 · 2017=4.3 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=5.8 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=37.7 · 2023=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Ottawa, IL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.3 · 218% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #137/265
  • PHOTO Warm Hearth
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~142 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Warm Hearth (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Pleasant View Lutheran Home in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pleasant View Lutheran Home averages 8.3 TCR (218% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pleasant View Lutheran Home TCR series: 2016=4.3 · 2017=4.3 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=5.8 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=37.7 · 2023=2.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Pleasant View Lutheran Home falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #137 safest of 265 Continuing care retirement com employers in Illinois.

Pleasant View Lutheran Home (142 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Pleasant View Lutheran Home
Pleasant View Lutheran Home (142 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Pleasant View Lutheran Home has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.6 0.0 2 0 0
2022 37.7 0.0 4 26 0
2021 3.8 0.0 3 0 0
2020 5.8 2.9 4 2 0
2019 4.4 1.8 4 1 0
2018 3.5 3.5 4 0 0
2017 4.3 3.4 4 1 0
2016 4.3 3.4 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · IL · Ottawa

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 67 employers in Ottawa, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Warm Hearth 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Foundation House 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Acoya Scottsdale at Troon 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cedarhurst Living, LLC - St. Charles 8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ferrero USA Inc 142 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rock Island Branch 142 FTE
STATE-SIZE BioUrja Renewables, LLC 142 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ecolab US11 142 FTE
CITY-NEAR OSF Saint Elizabeth Medical Center 624 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Elizabeth Medical Center 581 FTE
CITY-NEAR LaSalle County 500 FTE
CITY-NEAR 00000036 0036 OTTAWA DC 415 FTE
NAT-TCR PNW Livehaul - OR 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Everett, Wa #00052 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 10366 Bishops Corner (WO) 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Bryan TX FXFE-BRY 8.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Vancrest Health Care Centers 142 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fiesta # 25 142 FTE
NAT-SIZE Leclerc Foods USA 142 FTE
NAT-SIZE Earlens Corporation 142 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.