Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Arizona

Acoya Scottsdale at Troon

Scottsdale, AZ · ~81 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Acoya Scottsdale at Troon runs at 218% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Acoya Scottsdale at Troon: 8.3 TCR = 218% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Acoya Scottsdale at Troon safety composite

Acoya Scottsdale at Troon scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.3

2021→2024

Acoya Scottsdale at Troon injury rate improved

Acoya Scottsdale at Troon's TCR fell 5.3 from 10.5 in 2021 to 5.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 10.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=10.5 · 2022=10.2 · 2023=7.3 · 2024=5.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Scottsdale, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.3 · 218% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #69/109
  • PHOTO Cedarhurst Living, L…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~81 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cedarhurst Living, LLC - St. Charles (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Acoya Scottsdale at Troon in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Acoya Scottsdale at Troon averages 8.3 TCR (218% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Acoya Scottsdale at Troon TCR series: 2021=10.5 · 2022=10.2 · 2023=7.3 · 2024=5.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Acoya Scottsdale at Troon falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #69 safest of 109 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Arizona.

Acoya Scottsdale at Troon (81 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Acoya Scottsdale at Troon
Acoya Scottsdale at Troon (81 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Acoya Scottsdale at Troon has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.2 3.5 3 0 0
2023 7.3 3.7 4 0 0
2022 10.2 2.0 5 0 0
2021 10.5 7.9 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · AZ · Scottsdale

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 531 employers in Scottsdale, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cedarhurst Living, LLC - St. Charles 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR LINDSAY PLACE 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cottages at Cedar Run 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Manor Care Health Services - Summer Trace AL 8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Carrot Plant 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ocotillo Powerplant 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE M. R. Tanner Construction 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE THREE PHASE ELECTRIC, LLC 81 FTE
CITY-NEAR Educational Services LLC 6,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Scottsdale 4,077 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHEA MEDICAL CTR CAMPUS 2,881 FTE
CITY-NEAR SUPPORT SERVICES CAMPUS 2,800 FTE
NAT-TCR Petro NNJ - Kenvil 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Coho Distributing LLC - Everett 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Slidell Memorial Hospital 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Creative Stone Mfg, Inc. 8.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Farmington ISD #192-Levi P Dodge Middle School 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hollywood Super Market #6 LLC 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hollywood Super Market #1 LLC 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE World Class Distribution Daytona Hub 81 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.