Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing · Michigan

Pliant Plastics Corporation

Spring Lake, MI · ~139 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pliant Plastics Corporation runs at 63% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Pliant Plastics Corporation: 2.1 TCR = 63% of Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pliant Plastics Corporation safety composite

Pliant Plastics Corporation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pliant Plastics Corporation: 0.6 → 5.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 5.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.28× in 2024

Pliant Plastics Corporation's TCR rose 4.8 from 0.6 in 2016 to 5.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326121 · Spring Lake, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 63% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #1/5
  • PHOTO Welch Fluorocarbon
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~139 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Welch Fluorocarbon (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Pliant Plastics Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pliant Plastics Corporation averages 2.1 TCR (63% of the Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pliant Plastics Corporation TCR series: 2016=0.6 · 2018=2.4 · 2023=0.1 · 2024=5.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Pliant Plastics Corporation falls in its industry

202 Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tub establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 5 Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tub employers in Michigan.

Pliant Plastics Corporation (139 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Pliant Plastics Corporation
Pliant Plastics Corporation (139 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Pliant Plastics Corporation has more employees than the Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrig median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.3 2.7 6 0 0
2023 0.1 0.0 7 0 0
2018 2.4 2.4 4 0 0
2016 0.6 0.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326121 · MI · Spring Lake

202 Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 38 employers in Spring Lake, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Welch Fluorocarbon 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Zeus Orangeburg 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Burke Industries Florida; A subsidiary of Mannington Mills 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Athol 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Raker-Roberta's Young Plants 139 FTE
STATE-SIZE JH Campbell 3 139 FTE
STATE-SIZE CSM Group 139 FTE
STATE-SIZE Site Development, Inc. 139 FTE
CITY-NEAR Herman Miller, Inc, (Meridian) - 171st 792 FTE
CITY-NEAR MillerKnoll, Inc, (Meridian) - 171st 636 FTE
CITY-NEAR Herman Miller (Meridian) Hickory 333 FTE
CITY-NEAR MillerKnoll (Meridian) Hickory 312 FTE
NAT-TCR Oakwood Health and Rehab Center 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Solar Atmospheres of Western PA 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Foundation Health Services Inc 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Clark Contractors LLC 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Jimmie Crowder Excavating and Land Clearing Inc 139 FTE
NAT-SIZE University Swaging 139 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wayne Holden Company Inc 139 FTE
NAT-SIZE LOCKBOURNE 139 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.