Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing · New Hampshire

Welch Fluorocarbon

Dover, NH · ~62 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Welch Fluorocarbon runs at 63% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Welch Fluorocarbon: 2.1 TCR = 63% of Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Welch Fluorocarbon safety composite

Welch Fluorocarbon scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2016→2024

Welch Fluorocarbon injury rate improved

Welch Fluorocarbon's TCR fell 1.0 from 2.5 in 2016 to 1.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.5 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=4.9 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326121 · Dover, NH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 63% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO Pliant Plastics Corp…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pliant Plastics Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Hampshire employers → · Look up another →

Welch Fluorocarbon in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Welch Fluorocarbon averages 2.1 TCR (63% of the Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Welch Fluorocarbon TCR series: 2016=2.5 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=4.9 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=0 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Welch Fluorocarbon falls in its industry

202 Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tub establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Hampshire alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tub employers in New Hampshire.

Welch Fluorocarbon (62 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Welch Fluorocarbon
Welch Fluorocarbon (62 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Welch Fluorocarbon has fewer employees than the Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrig median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.2 2.8 0 3 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.2 0.0 1 0 0
2019 4.9 2.4 2 0 0
2018 3.5 3.5 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.5 2.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326121 · NH · Dover

202 Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,718 rated employers in New Hampshire with headcount on file · 73 employers in Dover, NH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pliant Plastics Corporation 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Zeus Orangeburg 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Athol 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Burke Industries Florida; A subsidiary of Mannington Mills 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE ENE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pilgrim Foods (div. of Old Dutch Mustard Co.) 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Milan Lumber Company 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE NGC-Portsmouth 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wentworth Douglass Hospital 3,380 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wentworth-Douglass Hospital 3,318 FTE
CITY-NEAR WDH/CENTRAL AVENUE 2,074 FTE
CITY-NEAR Measured Progress 440 FTE
NAT-TCR TX311 Camden Lumber 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR GLST1 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 8022205 - Universal 903 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon Greenville 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE TPC Logistics 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fresno 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holiday City Dc Bldg 310 - 3339 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ackert Park Skilled Nursing Rehabilitation Center 62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.