Valves, plumbing and heating, merchant wholesalers · Connecticut

Plimpton and Hills Branch 4

Fairfield, CT · ~28 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Plimpton and Hills Branch 4 runs at 124% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Valves, plumbing and heating, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade D.

Plimpton and Hills Branch 4: 2.7 TCR = 124% of Valves, plumbing and heating, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Plimpton and Hills Branch 4 safety composite

Plimpton and Hills Branch 4 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.1

2016→2019

Plimpton and Hills Branch 4 injury rate improved

Plimpton and Hills Branch 4's TCR fell 4.1 from 4.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.1 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.1 · 2018=4.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423720 · Fairfield, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 2.7 · 124% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/31
  • PHOTO Hajoca 079
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hajoca 079 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Plimpton and Hills Branch 4 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Plimpton and Hills Branch 4 averages 2.7 TCR (124% of the Valves, plumbing and heating, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Plimpton and Hills Branch 4 TCR series: 2016=4.1 · 2018=4 · 2019=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Plimpton and Hills Branch 4 falls in its industry

853 Valves, plumbing and heating, establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 31 Valves, plumbing and heating, employers in Connecticut.

Plimpton and Hills Branch 4 (28 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Plimpton and Hills Branch 4
Plimpton and Hills Branch 4 (28 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Plimpton and Hills Branch 4 has fewer employees than the Valves, plumbing and heating, merchant w median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.0 0.0 1 0 0
2016 4.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423720 · CT · Fairfield

853 Valves, plumbing and heating, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 63 employers in Fairfield, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hajoca 079 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Centerville Winsupply 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3730 Martin Luther King Jr Dr 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ferguson Enterprises LLC: VA Richmond - 2831 Cardwell Road 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE New Haven Harbor Station 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lake Road Generating Company LLC 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Connecticut Municipal Electric Energy Cooperative 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE New York Division 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fairfield Board of Education 1,670 FTE
CITY-NEAR 10317 Fairfield 266 FTE
CITY-NEAR Orthopaedic Specialty Group, P.C. 219 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ludlowe Center for health & rehab 206 FTE
NAT-TCR Palmetto Health Richland - PSC White Rock 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Foodliner-Winchester 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR MN,THIEF RIVER FALLS - Downtown Campus - Psychiatric and Substance Abuse Hospitals 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Pecos Terminal 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brim's Imports 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Workright Corporate 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE JSC Terminal LLC, dba Midwest Terminal 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Downtown Summerlin 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.