Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric · Arkansas

Plum Point Energy Station

Osceola, AR · ~78 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Plum Point Energy Station runs at 43% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric workplace, earning a grade A.

Plum Point Energy Station: 0.5 TCR = 43% of Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Plum Point Energy Station safety composite

Plum Point Energy Station scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Plum Point Energy Station held a steady TCR band

Plum Point Energy Station's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Osceola, AR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 43% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/11
  • PHOTO Hermiston Power Plant
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~78 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hermiston Power Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Plum Point Energy Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Plum Point Energy Station averages 0.5 TCR (43% of the Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Plum Point Energy Station TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Plum Point Energy Station falls in its industry

846 Power generation, fossil fuel establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 11 Power generation, fossil fuel employers in Arkansas.

Plum Point Energy Station (78 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Plum Point Energy Station
Plum Point Energy Station (78 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Plum Point Energy Station has more employees than the Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coa median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.3 1.2 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · AR · Osceola

846 Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 27 employers in Osceola, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hermiston Power Plant 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Conemaugh Generating Station 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR ENGIE North America - OSU 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Turkey Point Plant Fossil 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE The Source MO 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lafferty Equipment Manufacturing Inc 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE EZ LOADER CUSTOM BOAT TRAILERS, INC. 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aromatique, Inc 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR American Greetings Corporation 977 FTE
CITY-NEAR Big River Steel LLC 679 FTE
CITY-NEAR DENSO Manufacturing Arkansas 573 FTE
CITY-NEAR Viskase Companies Osceola Arkansas Plant 220 FTE
NAT-TCR Sunland Construction, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR O&M Hammond 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Roberts Company, Inc #1160 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Plant 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Plant 03 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Star Wipers- Newark 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Keokuk Hills Beef Company LLC 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Most, Inc. 78 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.