Tubing, mechanical and hypodermic sizes, cold-drawn stainless steel, made from purchased steel · Wisconsin

Plymouth Tube Company Trent

East Troy, WI · ~72 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Plymouth Tube Company Trent runs at 118% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Tubing, mechanical and hypodermic sizes, cold-drawn stainless steel, made from purchased steel workplace, earning a grade C.

Plymouth Tube Company Trent: 3.9 TCR = 118% of Tubing, mechanical and hypodermic sizes, cold-drawn stainless steel, made from purchased steel BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Plymouth Tube Company Trent safety composite

Plymouth Tube Company Trent scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Plymouth Tube Company Trent held a steady TCR band

Plymouth Tube Company Trent's TCR held near 0.2 from 2.9 in 2016 to 3.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.78× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.9 · 2017=5.8 · 2022=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331210 · East Troy, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.9 · 118% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #5/9
  • PHOTO Paragon Industries, …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~72 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Paragon Industries, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Plymouth Tube Company Trent in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Plymouth Tube Company Trent averages 3.9 TCR (118% of the Tubing, mechanical and hypodermic sizes, cold-drawn stainless steel, made from purchased steel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Plymouth Tube Company Trent TCR series: 2016=2.9 · 2017=5.8 · 2022=3 · BLS 3.3

Where Plymouth Tube Company Trent falls in its industry

329 Tubing, mechanical and hypoder establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 9 Tubing, mechanical and hypoder employers in Wisconsin.

Plymouth Tube Company Trent (72 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Plymouth Tube Company Trent
Plymouth Tube Company Trent (72 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Plymouth Tube Company Trent has fewer employees than the Tubing, mechanical and hypodermic sizes, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.0 3.0 2 0 0
2017 5.8 0.0 4 0 0
2016 2.9 1.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331210 · WI · East Troy

329 Tubing, mechanical and hypodermic sizes, cold-drawn stainless steel, made from purchased steel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 14 employers in East Troy, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Paragon Industries, Inc. 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Blaine 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atlas Tube Blytheville 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atlas Tube Alabama INC 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Johnson's Nursery LLC 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE MCGANN CONSTRUCTION INC 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valmet, Inc 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marawood Construction Services, Inc 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR MP Systems, Inc. 274 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wisconsin Oven 129 FTE
CITY-NEAR Accurate Housing Systems 107 FTE
CITY-NEAR WIS Oven 105 FTE
NAT-TCR Jewish Medical Center Southwest 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR HG656 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 2904-ASM-NY 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Magnolia Lane Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ruppert Landscape - Frederick 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE GloryBee - Production Facility 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE GloryBee - Distribution Center 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG384 72 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.