Powder coating metals and metal products for the trade · North Carolina

Pneu-Mech Systems Mfg. Inc.

Statesville, NC · ~80 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pneu-Mech Systems Mfg. Inc. runs at 146% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Powder coating metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade D.

Pneu-Mech Systems Mfg. Inc.: 4.8 TCR = 146% of Powder coating metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pneu-Mech Systems Mfg. Inc. safety composite

Pneu-Mech Systems Mfg. Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2018→2021

Pneu-Mech Systems Mfg. Inc. injury rate improved

Pneu-Mech Systems Mfg. Inc.'s TCR fell 2.5 from 6.5 in 2018 to 4.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=6.5 · 2019=5.6 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=4.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332812 · Statesville, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.8 · 146% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #9/12
  • PHOTO Richter Precision Inc.
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~80 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Richter Precision Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Pneu-Mech Systems Mfg. Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pneu-Mech Systems Mfg. Inc. averages 4.8 TCR (146% of the Powder coating metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pneu-Mech Systems Mfg. Inc. TCR series: 2018=6.5 · 2019=5.6 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=4 · BLS 3.3

Where Pneu-Mech Systems Mfg. Inc. falls in its industry

646 Powder coating metals and meta establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 12 Powder coating metals and meta employers in North Carolina.

Pneu-Mech Systems Mfg. Inc. (80 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Pneu-Mech Systems Mfg. Inc.
Pneu-Mech Systems Mfg. Inc. (80 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Pneu-Mech Systems Mfg. Inc. has more employees than the Powder coating metals and metal products median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.0 1.3 3 0 0
2020 3.3 3.3 3 0 0
2019 5.6 3.3 5 0 0
2018 6.5 3.9 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332812 · NC · Statesville

646 Powder coating metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 181 employers in Statesville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Richter Precision Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Best Metals Fabrication 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Raphael Paint Shop 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR AZZ Galvanizing - Nashville 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tri- Hishtil 808241 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bentwood Farms Inc. 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Davidson Water, Inc. 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Beam Construction Company, Inc. 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2807-0960 974 FTE
CITY-NEAR Doosan Bobcat 857 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0960 LOWE S NORTH CAROLINA RDC 836 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cheney Brothers Inc. - Statesville 830 FTE
NAT-TCR Mains'l Services, Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Northeast Building Products - Aramingo Ave 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Lockheed Window Corp. 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Usi, Inc 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE California Pacific Medical Center (274-CC-MMC) 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Office 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sutter Care at Home (247-SL) 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE LGS Pace, LLC.-PA 80 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.