Light rail system construction · Louisiana

Pointer Smith Contracting Corporation

Geismar, LA · ~74 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pointer Smith Contracting Corporation runs at 26% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Light rail system construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Pointer Smith Contracting Corporation: 0.7 TCR = 26% of Light rail system construction BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pointer Smith Contracting Corporation safety composite

Pointer Smith Contracting Corporation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2016→2020

Pointer Smith Contracting Corporation injury rate improved

Pointer Smith Contracting Corporation's TCR fell 1.2 from 1.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.4 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.2 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237990 · Geismar, LA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 26% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #76/110
  • PHOTO Spartan Directional,…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~74 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Spartan Directional, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

Pointer Smith Contracting Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pointer Smith Contracting Corporation averages 0.7 TCR (26% of the Light rail system construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pointer Smith Contracting Corporation TCR series: 2016=1.2 · 2017=0 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Pointer Smith Contracting Corporation falls in its industry

932 Light rail system construction establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #76 safest of 110 Light rail system construction employers in Louisiana.

Pointer Smith Contracting Corporation (74 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Pointer Smith Contracting Corporation
Pointer Smith Contracting Corporation (74 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Pointer Smith Contracting Corporation has more employees than the Light rail system construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.4 2.4 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.2 1.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237990 · LA · Geismar

932 Light rail system construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 127 employers in Geismar, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Spartan Directional, LLC 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR McCarthy Building Companies, Inc. - POH Berth 8 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Natt McDougall Company 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Capital Railroad Contracting, Inc. 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Landis Construction Company, LLC 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Performance Contractors, Inc. - Indorama Westlake 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Occidental (OxyChem) Convent LA 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Turner at Olin Chlor Alkali Products St. Gabriel LA 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR BASF 1,212 FTE
CITY-NEAR BASF - Geismar 1,143 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brock Services Geismar LA 936 FTE
CITY-NEAR Turner at Shell Chemical LP Geismar LA 674 FTE
NAT-TCR PA - Zara 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Philips 312 New Kensington 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR K94 AER - Bellville 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR CertainTeed RPG Little Rock 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Meridian Rehabilitation & Health Care Center 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central C100 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hamilton Heights 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ross store 324 74 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.