Homemaker's service for elderly or disabled persons, non-medical · Ohio

Central C100

Columbus, OH · ~74 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Central C100 runs at 122% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Homemaker's service for elderly or disabled persons, non-medical workplace, earning a grade D.

Central C100: 4.6 TCR = 122% of Homemaker's service for elderly or disabled persons, non-medical BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Central C100 safety composite

Central C100 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.1

2016→2020

Central C100 injury rate improved

Central C100's TCR fell 4.1 from 5.3 in 2016 to 1.2 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.5 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.3 · 2017=5.3 · 2018=7.5 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Columbus, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 122% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #25/40
  • PHOTO Senior Services for …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~74 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Senior Services for South Sound (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Central C100 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Central C100 averages 4.6 TCR (122% of the Homemaker's service for elderly or disabled persons, non-medical BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Central C100 TCR series: 2016=5.3 · 2017=5.3 · 2018=7.5 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=1.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Central C100 falls in its industry

1,320 Homemaker's service for elderl establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 40 Homemaker's service for elderl employers in Ohio.

Central C100 (74 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Central C100
Central C100 (74 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Central C100 has more employees than the Homemaker's service for elderly or disab median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 1.2 0.0 1 0 0
2019 3.8 1.3 3 0 0
2018 7.5 7.5 4 0 0
2017 5.3 2.7 4 0 0
2016 5.3 2.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · OH · Columbus

1,320 Homemaker's service for elderly or disabled persons, non-medical employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,500 employers in Columbus, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Senior Services for South Sound 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Community Options Greater Baltimore MD 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bakersfield Community Health Center, Inc. 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Community Options Burlington County NJ 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE STgenetics-Ohio Heifer Center 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE kILBARGER Construction, Inc. 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Steubenville Service Building 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lima Service Center 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nationwide Children's Hospital 13,367 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nationwide Children's Hospital Main Campus 10,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Methodist Hospital 9,759 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CMH1 5,057 FTE
NAT-TCR 4769-877-West Elm 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Webb Concrete & Building Materials, Inc. Oxford Ready Mix 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 584 Watertown, Ny 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 371 Bradenton, Fl 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pointer Smith Contracting Corporation 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meridian Rehabilitation & Health Care Center 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ross store 324 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ross store 493 74 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.